Knox's inertial spacetime functionalism (and a better alternative).

Eleanor Knox has argued that our concept of spacetime applies to whichever structure plays a certain functional role in the laws (the role of determining local inertial structure). I raise two objections to this inertial functionalism. First, it depends on a prior assumption about which coordinate s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 199; no. 2; pp. 277 - 299
Autor principal: Baker, David John
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Dec2021 Supplement 2
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=153929234&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 153929234
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2021 Supplement 2
      vid: 199
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        153929234
        10.1007/s11229-020-02598-z
      ppf: 277
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 291KB
      tig:
        atl: Knox's inertial spacetime functionalism (and a better alternative).
      aug:
        au: Baker, David John
        affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
      su:
        Spacetime
        Quantum field theory
        Topological fields
        Relativity (Physics)
        Systems theory
      sug:
        subj:
          Spacetime
          Quantum field theory
          Topological fields
          Relativity (Physics)
          Systems theory
      keyword:
        Relationism
        Relativity theory
        Substantivalism
      ab: Eleanor Knox has argued that our concept of spacetime applies to whichever structure plays a certain functional role in the laws (the role of determining local inertial structure). I raise two objections to this inertial functionalism. First, it depends on a prior assumption about which coordinate systems defined in a theory are reference frames, and hence on assumptions about which geometric structures are spatiotemporal. This makes Knox's account circular. Second, her account is vulnerable to several counterexamples, giving the wrong result when applied to topological quantum field theories and parity- and time-asymmetric theories. I advance an alternative account on which our spacetime concept is a cluster concept. On this view, the notion of metaphysical fundamentality may feature in the cluster, in which case spacetime functionalism may be uninformative in the absence of answers to fundamental metaphysical questions like the substantivalist/relationist debate.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2021. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N