A work motivational grounded theory study of workers in caring roles.
The aim of this study was to examine and construct a theoretical model of key elements that care workers perceive to have an impact on their autonomy, cohesion, and work motivation. Grounded theory was used for data collection and analysis. There were 20 participants from social welfare service, ger...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Interprofessional Care Vol. 35; no. 6; pp. 832 - 842 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Nov/Dec 2021
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=153993169&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 153993169 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 13561820 57N jtl: Journal of Interprofessional Care issn: 13561820 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Nov/Dec 2021 vid: 35 iid: 6 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 153993169 148352365 153993169 153993169 10.1080/13561820.2020.1860919 153993169 ppf: 832 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: A work motivational grounded theory study of workers in caring roles. aug: au: Jungert, Tomas Thornberg, Robert Lundstén, Louisa affil: Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden sug: subj: Health Personnel Patient Care Motivation Autonomy Sociology Models, Theoretical Theory Construction Human Male Female Adult Grounded Theory Adult: 19-44 years Male Female ab: The aim of this study was to examine and construct a theoretical model of key elements that care workers perceive to have an impact on their autonomy, cohesion, and work motivation. Grounded theory was used for data collection and analysis. There were 20 participants from social welfare service, geriatric care, and women's aid settings (women = 18, men = 2, mean age = 37.6). The analysis resulted in the following categories: (a) Being-a-Cohesive-Team; (b) Agency-Making; (c) Living-Up-to-Expectations; and (d) Developing-Support-and-Feedback. The results identified potential interactions between these factors and suggested how they influenced each other, showing how cohesion, autonomy, and motivation are interdependent and amplified. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|