The effects of concurrent biomechanical biofeedback on rowing performance at different stroke rates.
The aims of this study were to assess the effects of stroke rate (SR) on the ability of trained rowers to: a) comply with concurrent biomechanical biofeedback on knee-back-elbow joint sequencing; and b) transfer any changes to competition-intensity conditions (maximal rowing task). Following a five-...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Sports Sciences Vol. 39; no. 23; pp. 2716 - 2727 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Dec2021
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=154040299&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 154040299 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02640414 5BV jtl: Journal of Sports Sciences issn: 02640414 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Dec2021 vid: 39 iid: 23 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 154040299 151444113 154040299 154040299 10.1080/02640414.2021.1954349 154040299 ppf: 2716 ppct: 11 formats: tig: atl: The effects of concurrent biomechanical biofeedback on rowing performance at different stroke rates. aug: au: Gorman, Anthony J. Willmott, Alexander P. Mullineaux, David R. affil: School of Sport & Exercise Science, College of Social Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK sug: subj: Biofeedback Biomechanics Stroke Diagnosis Rowing Task Performance and Analysis Ergometry Exercise Intensity Evaluation Kinematics Evaluation Athletes Control Group Elbow Joint Physiology Knee Joint Physiology Pull Physiology Adaptation, Physiological Movement Athletic Training Transfer (Psychology) Human Male Female Young Adult Data Analysis Software Descriptive Statistics Male Female ab: The aims of this study were to assess the effects of stroke rate (SR) on the ability of trained rowers to: a) comply with concurrent biomechanical biofeedback on knee-back-elbow joint sequencing; and b) transfer any changes to competition-intensity conditions (maximal rowing task). Following a five-minute maximal rowing task (Baseline), 30 trained rowers were randomised to four groups. Two groups rowed at high SRs (90% maximum SR with biofeedback (BFb90) or control), while others rowed at low SRs (60% maximum SR with biofeedback (BFb60) or control) for 3 sessions. All rowers then completed another maximal rowing task (Transfer). Rowers complied with the biofeedback at both SRs, which promoted coordinative changes to knee-elbow motions during the pull. During Transfer, control rowers did not improve whereas those receiving biofeedback covered significantly greater distances (increase from Baseline: BFb60 = 6 ± 5%; BFb90 = 5 ± 4%; p < 0.05). However, movement adaptations were temporally different between SRs and were better maintained into Transfer by those that rowed at higher rates. This indicated biofeedback specificity, as transference of modified movement patterns appeared better when acquisition and transfer conditions were similar. These findings have practical implications for assimilating biofeedback into training programmes. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|