The visibility of philosophy of science in the sciences, 1980–2018.
In this paper, we provide a macro level analysis of the visibility of philosophy of science in the sciences over the last four decades. Our quantitative analysis of publications and citations of philosophy of science papers, published in 17 main journals representing the discipline, contributes to t...
| Publicado en: | Synthese Vol. 199; no. 3/4; pp. 6219 - 6250 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Dec2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=154096723&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 154096723 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00397857 4LI jtl: Synthese issn: 00397857 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2021 vid: 199 iid: 3/4 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 154096723 10.1007/s11229-021-03067-x ppf: 6219 ppct: 31 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.6MB tig: atl: The visibility of philosophy of science in the sciences, 1980–2018. aug: au: Khelfaoui, Mahdi Gingras, Yves Lemoine, Maël Pradeu, Thomas affil: Department of Human Sciences, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada Department of History, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Canada ImmunoConcept, UMR5164, CNRS, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France su: Philosophy of science Engineering mathematics Citation analysis Bibliometrics Quantitative research sug: subj: Philosophy of science Engineering mathematics Citation analysis Bibliometrics Quantitative research keyword: Sciences Visibility ab: In this paper, we provide a macro level analysis of the visibility of philosophy of science in the sciences over the last four decades. Our quantitative analysis of publications and citations of philosophy of science papers, published in 17 main journals representing the discipline, contributes to the longstanding debate on the influence of philosophy of science on the sciences. It reveals the global structure of relationships that philosophy of science maintains with science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) and social sciences and humanities (SSH) fields. Explored at the level of disciplines, journals and authors, this analysis of the relations between philosophy of science and a large and diversified array of disciplines allows us to answer several questions: what is the degree of openness of various disciplines to the specialized knowledge produced in philosophy of science? Which STEM and SSH fields and journals have privileged ties with philosophy of science? What are the characteristics, in terms of citation and publication patterns, of authors who get their philosophy of science papers cited outside their field? Complementing existing qualitative inquiries on the influence of specific authors, concepts or topics of philosophy of science, the bibliometric approach proposed in this paper offers a comprehensive portrait of the multiple relationships that links philosophy of science to the sciences. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2021. All Rights Reserved. item: Synthese holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2021 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|