A new paradox and the reconciliation of Lorentz and Galilean transformations.

One of the most debated problems in the foundations of the special relativity theory is the role of conventionality. A common belief is that the Lorentz transformation is correct but the Galilean transformation is wrong (only approximately correct in low speed limit). It is another common belief tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 199; no. 3/4; pp. 8113 - 8143
Autor principal: Guo, Hongyu
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Dec2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=154096805&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 154096805
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2021
      vid: 199
      iid: 3/4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        154096805
        10.1007/s11229-021-03155-y
      ppf: 8113
      ppct: 30
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 823KB
      tig:
        atl: A new paradox and the reconciliation of Lorentz and Galilean transformations.
      aug:
        au: Guo, Hongyu
        affil: University of Houston—Victoria, 22400 Grand Circle Blvd, 77449, Katy, TX, USA
      su:
        Lorentz transformations
        General relativity (Physics)
        Maxwell equations
        Paradox
        Coordinate transformations
        Wave equation
      sug:
        subj:
          Lorentz transformations
          General relativity (Physics)
          Maxwell equations
          Paradox
          Coordinate transformations
          Wave equation
      keyword:
        Conventionality of simultaneity
        Equivalence
        General relativity
        New paradox
        Sagnac effect
        Selleri's paradox
      ab: One of the most debated problems in the foundations of the special relativity theory is the role of conventionality. A common belief is that the Lorentz transformation is correct but the Galilean transformation is wrong (only approximately correct in low speed limit). It is another common belief that the Galilean transformation is incompatible with Maxwell equations. However, the "principle of general covariance" in general relativity makes any spacetime coordinate transformation equally valid. This includes the Galilean transformation as well. This renders a new paradox. This new paradox is resolved with the argument that the Galilean transformation is equivalent to the Lorentz transformation. The resolution of this new paradox also provides the most straightforward resolution of an older paradox which is due to Selleri in (Found Phys Lett 10:73–83, 1997). I also present a consistent electrodynamics formulation including Maxwell equations and electromagnetic wave equations under the Galilean transformation, in the exact form for any high speed, rather than in low speed approximation. Electrodynamics in rotating reference frames is rarely addressed in textbooks. The presented formulation of electrodynamics under the Galilean transformation even works well in rotating frames if we replace the constant velocity v with v = ω × r . This provides a practical tool for applications of electrodynamics in rotating frames. When electrodynamics is concerned, between two inertial reference frames, both Galilean and Lorentz transformations are equally valid, but the Lorentz transformation is more convenient. In rotating frames, although the Galilean electrodynamics does not seem convenient, it could be the most convenient formulation compared with other transformations, due to the intrinsic complex nature of the problem.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2021. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N