The Unfolding of Cognitive Effort During Sentence Processing: Pupillometric Evidence From People With and Without Aphasia.

Purpose: Arousal and cognitive effort are relevant yet often overlooked components of attention during language processing. Pupillometry can be used to provide a psychophysiological index of arousal and cognitive effort. Given that much is unknown regarding the relationship between cognition and lan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 64; no. 12; pp. 4900 - 4918
Autores principales: Chapman, Laura Roche, Hallowell, Brooke
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Dec2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=154172455&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 154172455
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10924388
        1SM
      jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
      issn: 10924388
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2021
      vid: 64
      iid: 12
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        154172455
        10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00129
      ppf: 4900
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1MB
      tig:
        atl: The Unfolding of Cognitive Effort During Sentence Processing: Pupillometric Evidence From People With and Without Aphasia.
      aug:
        au:
          Chapman, Laura Roche
          Hallowell, Brooke
        affil:
          Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC
          School of Health Sciences, Springfield College, MA
      su:
        Cognition
        Language disorders
        Attention
        Arousal (Physiology)
        Linguistics
        Sentences (Grammar)
        Pupillometrics
        Aphasic persons
        Pupillometry
        Psychophysiology
        Aphasia
        Phonological awareness
        Word recognition
        Pupil (Eye)
        Reflexes
        Vision testing
        T-test (Statistics)
        Research funding
        Descriptive statistics
      sug:
        subj:
          Cognition
          Language disorders
          Attention
          Arousal (Physiology)
          Linguistics
          Sentences (Grammar)
          Pupillometrics
          Aphasic persons
          Pupillometry
          Psychophysiology
          Aphasia
          Phonological awareness
          Word recognition
          Pupil (Eye)
          Reflexes
          Vision testing
          T-test (Statistics)
          Research funding
          Descriptive statistics
      ab: Purpose: Arousal and cognitive effort are relevant yet often overlooked components of attention during language processing. Pupillometry can be used to provide a psychophysiological index of arousal and cognitive effort. Given that much is unknown regarding the relationship between cognition and language deficits seen in people with aphasia (PWA), pupillometry may be uniquely suited to explore those relationships. The purpose of this study was to examine arousal and the time course of the allocation of cognitive effort related to sentence processing in people with and without aphasia. Method: Nineteen PWA and age- and education-matched control participants listened to relatively easy (subject-relative) and relatively difficult (object-relative) sentences and were required to answer occasional comprehension questions. Tonic and phasic pupillary responses were used to index arousal and the unfolding of cognitive effort, respectively, while sentences were processed. Group differences in tonic and phasic responses were examined. Results: Group differences were observed for both tonic and phasic responses. PWA exhibited greater overall arousal throughout the task compared with controls, as evidenced by larger tonic pupil responses. Controls exhibited more effort (greater phasic responses) for difficult compared with easy sentences; PWA did not. Group differences in phasic responses were apparent during end-of-sentence and postsentence time windows. Conclusions: Results indicate that the attentional state of PWA in this study was not consistently supportive of adequate task engagement. PWA in our sample may have relatively limited attentional capacity or may have challenges with allocating existing capacity in ways that support adequate task engagement and performance. This work adds to the body of evidence supporting the validity of pupillometric tasks for the study of aphasia and contributes to a better understanding of the nature of language deficits in aphasia. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.16959376
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N