It's All About Solidarity Stupid! How Solidarity Frames Structure the Party Political Sphere.
Inspired by Lipset and Rokkan, the field of political science has primarily focused on party oppositions as a derivative of historically anchored conflicts among social groups. Yet parties are not mere social mirrors; they are also active interpreters of social context. In a globalized era they depl...
| Publicado en: | British Journal of Political Science Vol. 52; no. 1; pp. 128 - 146 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
Jan2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=154214600&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 154214600 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00071234 BPS jtl: British Journal of Political Science issn: 00071234 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2022 vid: 52 iid: 1 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 154214600 10.1017/S0007123420000137 ppf: 128 ppct: 18 formats: tig: atl: It's All About Solidarity Stupid! How Solidarity Frames Structure the Party Political Sphere. aug: au: Thijssen, Peter Verheyen, Pieter affil: University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium su: Flanders Political parties Solidarity Social conflict Social groups Political science Structural frames sug: subj: Political parties Solidarity Social conflict Social groups Political science Flanders Political Organizations Finish Carpentry Contractors Framing Contractors Structural frames keyword: cleavage conflict framing integration manifesto party competition solidarity cleavage conflict framing integration manifesto party competition solidarity ab: Inspired by Lipset and Rokkan, the field of political science has primarily focused on party oppositions as a derivative of historically anchored conflicts among social groups. Yet parties are not mere social mirrors; they are also active interpreters of social context. In a globalized era they deploy conflicting frames on how solidarity may be preserved, as recent work on populist welfare chauvinism shows. However, the role of party political agency in framing solidarity lacks an overarching framework. This article therefore proposes a Durkheimian model that takes the integrative pole of the conflict–integration dialectic seriously and distinguishes among group-based, compassionate, exchange-based and empathic frames. The authors test this solidarity framework in Flanders (Belgium) – a good case study due to its fragmented party system and increasing economic and cultural openness. The content analyses of party manifestos presented here suggest that a solidarity-based deductive approach to studying partisan competition is relevant because partisan differentiation along solidarity lines is growing; this evolution converges with similar inductive expert-based and issue-based findings. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|