The opacity of play: a reply to commentators.

Patridge takes it as morally better that the transparent game-player with social ends will constantly monitor the other players and adjust their play-style to match. For such players, we may only able to detect the difference between striving players and achievement players in their extra-game behav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of the Philosophy of Sport Vol. 48; no. 3; pp. 448 - 476
Autor principal: Nguyen, C. Thi
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Nov2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=154224392&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 154224392
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00948705
        JPT
      jtl: Journal of the Philosophy of Sport
      issn: 00948705
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2021
      vid: 48
      iid: 3
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        154224392
        10.1080/00948705.2021.1993870
      ppf: 448
      ppct: 28
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The opacity of play: a reply to commentators.
      aug:
        au: Nguyen, C. Thi
        affil: Department of Philosophy, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
      su:
        Pleasure
        Poetry (Literary form)
        Kinship
        Computer operating systems
        Journalists
        Philosophical literature
      sug:
        subj:
          Pleasure
          Poetry (Literary form)
          Kinship
          Computer operating systems
          Journalists
          Philosophical literature
      ab: Patridge takes it as morally better that the transparent game-player with social ends will constantly monitor the other players and adjust their play-style to match. For such players, we may only able to detect the difference between striving players and achievement players in their extra-game behavior. I want to give novice players a chance to stretch their legs and figure out how the game works without hamstringing them at the first move.[1] So if opaquely layered striving players really were incapable of such adaptation, that would show that striving play lacked a capacity for a certain kind of social grace. Currie's example only makes sense if achievement players play with a more deathly grip on the win, and striving players play more lightheartedly. For example, Patridge worries that the transparent game-player will be able to adjust themselves mid-play to suit the social purpose (Patridge, 374-6).
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N