《哀歌》与《哀郢》主体差异性的比较与探源.
Lamentations and lament of capital Ying are models of city lament in ancient Hebrew-and Chinese classical literary traditions respectively. A comparative study shows that there are significant subject differences between lamentations and lament of capital Ying. Lamentations is the collective works,...
| Publicado en: | International Journal of Sino-Western Studies Vol. 21; pp. 91 - 100 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Eurasia Academic Publishing Group
Dec2021
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | Lamentations and lament of capital Ying are models of city lament in ancient Hebrew-and Chinese classical literary traditions respectively. A comparative study shows that there are significant subject differences between lamentations and lament of capital Ying. Lamentations is the collective works, and its compilation and inheritance function as emotional expression of sufferings of the past, present and future of the Jewish people»reflecting their infinite belief of transcendent God. In contrast, lament of capital Ying is the creation of Qu Yuan, and under the influence of the sage's commtmcnt to the mandate of heaven by his individual virtue. The poem expresses Qu Yuan's personal grief through a special literary technique and its succession and experience in later generations are mainly individual. The subject diferencesoftwopoetryisareflectionofdiferentdevelopmenttrajectoriesofthehumans-transcendentrelationshipin Hebrew-and the Chinese civilizations of the Axial Age. 《哀歌》与《哀郢》分别是古希伯来文学传统和中国古典文学传统中"城市哀歌"的典范.对两者的比较研究表 明, 《哀歌》与《哀郢》存在着显著的主体差异性, 前者是群体性的作品, 其形成与传承是犹太民族面对过去、现今与将来 一切苦难的情感表达, 反映出他们对作为超越者的上帝的无限信仰;相比之下, 后者是屈原个人的创作, 它受到了君子 以德行承担天命的影响, 诗歌以骚体的文学手法表达出诗人的哀痛, 它的传承与体验也主要是个体性的。《哀歌》与《哀 郢》代表了两种不同的哀歌传统, 两者间的主体差异性是"轴心时期"的古希伯来文明和华夏文明在人与超越者的关系 上不同演变的结果, 反映出中希两种文学传统迥异的价值取向. |
|---|