Agential thinking.
In his 2009 monograph, Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection, Peter Godfrey-Smith accuses biologists of demonstrating 'Darwinian Paranoia' when they engage in what he dubs 'agential thinking'. But as Daniel Dennett points out, he offers neither an illuminating set of examples nor an extended a...
| Publicado en: | Synthese Vol. 199; no. 5/6; pp. 13393 - 13420 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Dec2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=154480419&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 154480419 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00397857 4LI jtl: Synthese issn: 00397857 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2021 vid: 199 iid: 5/6 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 154480419 10.1007/s11229-021-03380-5 ppf: 13393 ppct: 27 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 733KB tig: atl: Agential thinking. aug: au: Veit, Walter affil: University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia su: Dennett, Daniel Clement, 1942- Natural selection Biologists Paranoia Propaganda sug: subj: Dennett, Daniel Clement, 1942- Natural selection Biologists Paranoia Propaganda keyword: Agency Agential thinking Intentional stance ab: In his 2009 monograph, Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection, Peter Godfrey-Smith accuses biologists of demonstrating 'Darwinian Paranoia' when they engage in what he dubs 'agential thinking'. But as Daniel Dennett points out, he offers neither an illuminating set of examples nor an extended argument for this assertion, deeming it to be a brilliant propaganda stroke against what is actually a useful way of thinking. Compared to the dangers of teleological thinking in biology, the dangers of agential thinking have unfortunately rarely been discussed. Drawing on recent work by Samir Okasha, I attempt to remedy this omission, through analyzing the nature of agential thinking, and providing a philosophical treatment of the unexamined dangers in this peculiar, yet tempting way of thinking. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2021. All Rights Reserved. item: Synthese holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2021 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|