Degree and pattern of dual-task interference during walking vary with component tasks in people after stroke: a systematic review.
What are the degree and pattern of dual-task interference during walking in people after stroke? How do these vary with disease chronicity and different component tasks in people after stroke? How does dual-task interference differ between people after stroke and people without stroke? Systematic re...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Physiotherapy (Elsevier) Vol. 68; no. 1; pp. 26 - 37 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
Jan2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=154560048&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 154560048 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 18369553 HKLL jtl: Journal of Physiotherapy (Elsevier) issn: 18369553 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2022 vid: 68 iid: 1 pid: 467 pub: Elsevier B.V. place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 154560048 154560048 154560048 10.1016/j.jphys.2021.12.009 154560048 ppf: 26 ppct: 11 formats: tig: atl: Degree and pattern of dual-task interference during walking vary with component tasks in people after stroke: a systematic review. aug: au: Tsang, Charlotte Sau-Lan Wang, Shuting Miller, Tiev Pang, Marco Yiu-Chung affil: Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong sug: subj: Stroke Patients Task Performance and Analysis Walking Evaluation Human Systematic Review Meta Analysis Psychomotor Performance Evaluation Walking Speed Uncertainty Descriptive Statistics Confidence Intervals Sensitivity and Specificity Chronic Disease Stroke Rehabilitation Cognition Evaluation ab: What are the degree and pattern of dual-task interference during walking in people after stroke? How do these vary with disease chronicity and different component tasks in people after stroke? How does dual-task interference differ between people after stroke and people without stroke? Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies reporting gait-related dual-task interference. People after stroke and people without stroke. Measures of walking and secondary (cognitive or manual) task performance under dual-task conditions relative to those under single-task conditions. Seventy-six studies (2,425 people after stroke and 492 people without stroke) were included. Manual and mental tracking tasks imposed the greatest dual-task interference on gait speed, although there was substantial uncertainty in these estimates. Among mental tracking tasks, the apparently least-complex task (serial 1 subtractions) induced the greatest dual-task interference (−0.17 m/s, 95% CI −0.24 to −0.10) on gait speed, although there was substantial uncertainty in these estimates. Mutual interference (decrement in both walking and secondary component task performances during dual-tasking) was the most common dual-task interference pattern. The results of the sensitivity analyses for studies involving people with chronic stroke were similar to the results of the primary analyses. The amount of dual-task interference from a mental tracking or manual task during walking was similar between people with or without stroke. The degree and pattern of dual-task interference vary with the choice of component tasks. When evaluating limitations to functional mobility during dual-tasking conditions and in planning interventions accordingly, clinicians should select dual-task assessments that correspond to the daily habits and physical demands of people after stroke. CRD42017059004. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: meta analysis research systematic review Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|