To err is human but not deceptive.

This study addresses a poorly understood but important question concerning the cognition of deception: How much more is there to lying than to responding incorrectly, the latter capturing how researchers have occasionally operationalized deception? A recent social-cognitive account of lying – Activa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos

Publicado en:	Memory & Cognition Vol. 50; no. 1; pp. 232 - 245
Autores principales:	Walczyk, Jeffrey J., Cockrell, Natalie F.
Formato:	Artículo
Publicado:	Springer Nature Jan2022
Materias:	Disclosure Cognition Psychology Interpersonal relations Deception Thought & thinking Medical protocols Human error Theory Reaction time Intention
Acceso en línea:	Ver este registro en EBSCOhost