Chance and the Continuum Hypothesis.

This paper presents and defends an argument that the continuum hypothesis is false, based on considerations about objective chance and an old theorem due to Banach and Kuratowski. More specifically, I argue that the probabilistic inductive methods standardly used in science presuppose that every pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy & Phenomenological Research Vol. 103; no. 3; pp. 639 - 661
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Nov2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=154834420&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 154834420
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318205
        PPO
      jtl: Philosophy & Phenomenological Research
      issn: 00318205
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2021
      vid: 103
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        154834420
        10.1111/phpr.12708
      ppf: 639
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.3MB
      tig:
        atl: Chance and the Continuum Hypothesis.
      aug:
      su:
        Continuum hypothesis
        Set theory
        Generalized continuum hypothesis
        Probabilistic number theory
        Axioms
      sug:
        subj:
          Continuum hypothesis
          Set theory
          Generalized continuum hypothesis
          Probabilistic number theory
          Axioms
      ab: This paper presents and defends an argument that the continuum hypothesis is false, based on considerations about objective chance and an old theorem due to Banach and Kuratowski. More specifically, I argue that the probabilistic inductive methods standardly used in science presuppose that every proposition about the outcome of a chancy process has a certain chance between 0 and 1. I also argue in favour of the standard view that chances are countably additive. Since it is possible to randomly pick out a point on a continuum, for instance using a roulette wheel or by flipping a countable infinity of fair coins, it follows, given the axioms of ZFC, that there are many different cardinalities between countable infinity and the cardinality of the continuum.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy & Phenomenological Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy & Phenomenological Research
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N