Isolation, not locality.

There is a long tradition of preferring local theories to ones that posit lawful or causal influence at a spacetime distance. In this paper, we argue against this preference. We argue that nonlocality is scientifically unobjectionable and that nonlocal theories can be known. Scientists can gather ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy & Phenomenological Research Vol. 103; no. 3; pp. 607 - 620
Autores principales: Demarest, Heather, Hicks, Michael Townsen
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Nov2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=154834426&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 154834426
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318205
        PPO
      jtl: Philosophy & Phenomenological Research
      issn: 00318205
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2021
      vid: 103
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        154834426
        10.1111/phpr.12731
      ppf: 607
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 406KB
      tig:
        atl: Isolation, not locality.
      aug:
        au:
          Demarest, Heather
          Hicks, Michael Townsen
        affil:
          University of Colorado
          University of Birmingham
      su:
        Lawful force
        Criminal justice system
        Police brutality
        Social theory
        Scientific method
      sug:
        subj:
          Lawful force
          Criminal justice system
          Police brutality
          Social theory
          Scientific method
      ab: There is a long tradition of preferring local theories to ones that posit lawful or causal influence at a spacetime distance. In this paper, we argue against this preference. We argue that nonlocality is scientifically unobjectionable and that nonlocal theories can be known. Scientists can gather evidence for them and confirm them in much the same way that they do for local theories. We think these observations point to a deeper constraint on scientific theorizing and experimentation: the (quasi‐) isolation of causal or lawful influence. We argue that this requirement ought to replace the locality desideratum in science. We then explore the possibility that the order of explanation has been reversed: perhaps it is isolatable influence that determines what counts as local in the first place.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy & Phenomenological Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy & Phenomenological Research
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N