POLANYI AND KAHNEMAN AND ON JUDGING AND DECIDING.

Similarities between what Michael Polanyi and Daniel Kahneman wrote about the acts of judging and deciding are partly the result of taking seriously the findings of Gestalt psychology. Both men treat acts of judging and deciding as analogous to acts of perceiving. This similarity is the reason that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Tradition & Discovery Vol. 48; no. 1; pp. 19 - 31
Autor principal: Moodey, Richard W.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Polanyi Society Feb2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=154905239&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 154905239
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10571027
        1HK2
      jtl: Tradition & Discovery
      issn: 10571027
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2022
      vid: 48
      iid: 1
      pid: 26331
      pub: Polanyi Society
    artinfo:
      ui:
        154905239
        10.5840/traddisc20224813
      ppf: 19
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 506KB
      tig:
        atl: POLANYI AND KAHNEMAN AND ON JUDGING AND DECIDING.
      aug:
        au: Moodey, Richard W.
      su:
        Polanyi, Michael, 1891-1976
        Gestalt psychology
        Kahneman, Daniel, 1934-2024
        Legal judgments
        Decision making
      sug:
        subj:
          Polanyi, Michael, 1891-1976
          Gestalt psychology
          Kahneman, Daniel, 1934-2024
          Legal judgments
          Decision making
      keyword:
        deciding
        dual processing
        heuristics
        judgment
        Kahneman
        Polanyi
      ab: Similarities between what Michael Polanyi and Daniel Kahneman wrote about the acts of judging and deciding are partly the result of taking seriously the findings of Gestalt psychology. Both men treat acts of judging and deciding as analogous to acts of perceiving. This similarity is the reason that the differences between Kahneman and Polanyi are mostly complementary, rather than contradictory. Among the things Polanyians can contribute to the interdisciplinary field of judgment and decision making are commitment, the from-to structure, and the image of leaping across a logical gap. Among the things Polanyians can learn from Kahneman is a pragmatic distinction between judging and deciding, a distinction between fast and slow thinking, and a heightened awareness of the many ways tacit heuristics and biases lead to mistaken judgments and bad decisions.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Tradition & Discovery is the property of Polanyi Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Tradition & Discovery
      holder: Polanyi Society
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N