A FLOWING TIME INTERPRETATION OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY VIA AN INHOMOGENEOUS TENSE‐AS‐RELATIONAL ONTOLOGY: A COMMENT ON SAULSON.

First, the traditional debates on time: In 1927, J. M. E. McTaggart notably defended a "static time" interpretation of SR by pointing to what he considered as a fundamental paradox in any flowing time rendition: Past, present and future are incompatible determinations. Prof. Saulson begins with the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science Vol. 56; no. 4; pp. 943 - 946
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Open Library of Humanities Dec2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=154963153&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 154963153
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        05912385
        ZYG
      jtl: Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science
      issn: 05912385
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2021
      vid: 56
      iid: 4
      pid: 15576
      pub: Open Library of Humanities
    artinfo:
      ui:
        154963153
        10.1111/zygo.12756
      ppf: 943
      ppct: 3
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 130KB
      tig:
        atl: A FLOWING TIME INTERPRETATION OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY VIA AN INHOMOGENEOUS TENSE‐AS‐RELATIONAL ONTOLOGY: A COMMENT ON SAULSON.
      aug:
      su:
        Special relativity (Physics)
        Ontology
        Relativity (Physics)
        Time dilation
        Euclidean geometry
      sug:
        subj:
          Special relativity (Physics)
          Ontology
          Relativity (Physics)
          Time dilation
          Euclidean geometry
      ab: First, the traditional debates on time: In 1927, J. M. E. McTaggart notably defended a "static time" interpretation of SR by pointing to what he considered as a fundamental paradox in any flowing time rendition: Past, present and future are incompatible determinations. Prof. Saulson begins with the fact that the light cone in SR that accompanies an event P in spacetime divides the world into the causal future, the causal past, and the acausal elsewhere. A FLOWING TIME INTERPRETATION OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY VIA AN INHOMOGENEOUS TENSE-AS-RELATIONAL ONTOLOGY: A COMMENT ON SAULSON.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science is the property of Open Library of Humanities and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science
      holder: Open Library of Humanities
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N