Utility of 2D Video Analysis for Assessing Frontal Plane Trunk and Pelvis Motion during Stepping, Landing, and Change in Direction Tasks: A Validity Study.

Background Excessive frontal plane motion of the trunk and/or pelvis has been implicated in numerous clinical conditions. To date, it is unclear whether 2D video is an appropriate surrogate for assessing frontal plane trunk and pelvis motion as a comprehensive validity study across a wide range of m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Vol. 17; no. 2; pp. 139 - 148
Autores principales: Straub, Rachel K., Powers, Christopher M.
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=155000497&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 155000497
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        21592896
        BKL5
      jtl: International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
      issn: 21592896
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2022
      vid: 17
      iid: 2
      pid: 38303
      pub: North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
      place: Indianapolis, Indiana
    artinfo:
      ui:
        155000497
        155000497
        155000497
        10.26603/001c.30994
        155000497
      ppf: 139
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Utility of 2D Video Analysis for Assessing Frontal Plane Trunk and Pelvis Motion during Stepping, Landing, and Change in Direction Tasks: A Validity Study.
      aug:
        au:
          Straub, Rachel K.
          Powers, Christopher M.
        affil: Division of Biokinesiology & Physical Therapy, University of Southern California
      sug:
        subj:
          Torso Physiology
          Pelvis Physiology
          Reliability and Validity
          Videorecording Evaluation
          Kinematics Evaluation
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Human
          Concurrent Validity
          Crossover Design
          Step Evaluation
          Hopping
          Motion
          Knee
          Flexion
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Descriptive Statistics
          Child
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Athletes
          Jumping
          Motion Analysis Systems
          Software
          Data Analysis Software
          Correlational Studies
          Child: 6-12 years
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
      ab: Background Excessive frontal plane motion of the trunk and/or pelvis has been implicated in numerous clinical conditions. To date, it is unclear whether 2D video is an appropriate surrogate for assessing frontal plane trunk and pelvis motion as a comprehensive validity study across a wide range of movements using a consistent methodology has not been performed. Hypothesis/Purpose The purpose of the current study was to assess the concurrent validity and agreement of frontal plane pelvis and trunk motion obtained with 2D video against the respective 3D angles during stepping, landing, and change in direction tasks. Design Crossover Study Design. Methods 3D kinematics and 2D frontal plane video were obtained from 39 healthy participants (15 males and 24 females) during five athletic tasks (step down, lateral shuffle, deceleration, triple hop, side-step-cut). Data were extracted at peak knee flexion. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to assess the association between the 2D and 3D frontal plane angles at the trunk and pelvis. Bland Altman plots were used to assess the level of agreement between the 2D and 3D frontal plane angles at the trunk and pelvis. Results 2D and 3D frontal plane angles for all tasks were correlated in a positive direction at the pelvis (r = 0.54 to 0.73, all p < 0.001) and trunk (r = 0.81 to 0.92, all p < 0.001). Absolute agreement in the frontal plane for all tasks and angles was below 5°. However, the 95% limits of agreement across tasks ranged from -12.8° to 21.3° for the pelvis and -11.8° to 9.4° for the trunk. Conclusions The use of 2D video to assess frontal plane trunk and pelvis motion is appropriate during stepping, landing, and change of direction tasks, however caution is advised when high levels of agreement or accuracy is required.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N