El Libro del arte de cozina de Diego Granado Maldonado. Estado del arte.
Not much has been written about diego Granado's cookbool and hypotheses and errors continue to circulate that basically depend on the lack of a criticale edition that clarifies the origin of the various parts of the text and, above all, that facilitates its reading. It is a very heterogeneous and so...
| Publicado en: | Scripta Vol. 18; pp. 211 - 223 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Scripta
des2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=155231636&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 155231636 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 23404841 GD46 jtl: Scripta issn: 23404841 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: des2021 vid: 18 pid: 89094 pub: Scripta artinfo: ui: 155231636 10.7203/SCRIPTA.18.22776 ppf: 211 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.4MB tig: atl: El Libro del arte de cozina de Diego Granado Maldonado. Estado del arte. aug: au: DE BENEDETTO, NANCY affil: Università degli Studi di Bari su: Plagiarism Hypothesis Cookbooks Reading Treaties sug: subj: Plagiarism Hypothesis Cookbooks Reading Treaties keyword: cookbooks ichtionyms source texts translation treaties ictiónimos recetarios textos fuente traducción tratados ab: Not much has been written about diego Granado's cookbool and hypotheses and errors continue to circulate that basically depend on the lack of a criticale edition that clarifies the origin of the various parts of the text and, above all, that facilitates its reading. It is a very heterogeneous and somewhat chaotic text wchich I am faced here only to present a recognition of the most important questions regarding the treatment of its two main sources. On the one hand Granado plagiarizes Robert de Nola's Libro de guisados (1529) which edition we fix here. On the other he tranalates the main part of Bartolomeo Scappi's Opera (1570). The author's working method reveals various cultural and linguistic inconsistencies that have been observed in relation to the treatment of ichthionyms. Sobre el recetario de Diego Granado no se ha escrito mucho y siguen circulando hipótesis y errores que dependen básicamente de la falta de una edición crítica que aclare la procedencia de las diversas partes del texto y, sobre todo, que facilite su lectura. Se trata de un texto muy heterogéneo y algo caótico con el que me enfrento aquí solo para presentar un análisis de las cuestiones más importantes relativas al tratamiento de sus dos fuentes principales. Por una parte, realiza Granado un plagio del Libro de guisados de Robert de Nola (1529). Por el otro, traduce buena parte de la Opera de Bartolomeo Scappi (1570). El método de trabajo del autor revela diversas incongruencias cultuales y lingüísticas que se han observado respecto al tratamiento de los ictiónimos. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Spanish refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Scripta is the property of Scripta and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Scripta holder: Scripta dt: @attributes: year: 2021 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|