Tinkering as Collective Practice: A Qualitative Study on Handling Ethical Tensions in Supporting People with Intellectual or Psychiatric Disabilities.

The values of patient autonomy and community participation have become central in health care. However, care practices involve a plurality of possibly conflicting values. These values often transgress the borders of the individual professional–client relationship as they involve family members, othe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Ethics & Social Welfare Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 36 - 54
Autores principales: Heerings, Marjolijn, van de Bovenkamp, Hester, Cardol, Mieke, Bal, Roland
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Mar 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=155317922&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 155317922
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        17496535
        30NM
      jtl: Ethics & Social Welfare
      issn: 17496535
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar 2022
      vid: 16
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        155317922
        10.1080/17496535.2021.1954223
      ppf: 36
      ppct: 18
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Tinkering as Collective Practice: A Qualitative Study on Handling Ethical Tensions in Supporting People with Intellectual or Psychiatric Disabilities.
      aug:
        au:
          Heerings, Marjolijn
          van de Bovenkamp, Hester
          Cardol, Mieke
          Bal, Roland
        affil:
          Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
          Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands
      su:
        People with intellectual disabilities
        Services for people with disabilities
        Disabilities
        Community involvement
        Patient autonomy
        Community housing
      sug:
        subj:
          People with intellectual disabilities
          Services for people with disabilities
          Disabilities
          Community involvement
          Services for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities
          Other Community Housing Services
          Community housing services
          Patient autonomy
          Community housing
      keyword:
        autonomy
        intellectual disability
        mental health recovery
        Patient relations
        psychiatric rehabilitation
        autonomy
        intellectual disability
        mental health recovery
        Patient relations
        psychiatric rehabilitation
      ab: The values of patient autonomy and community participation have become central in health care. However, care practices involve a plurality of possibly conflicting values. These values often transgress the borders of the individual professional–client relationship as they involve family members, other professionals and community organisations. Good care should acknowledge this relational complexity, which requires a collective handling of the tensions between values. To better understand this process, we draw on [Mol, A. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. Routledge; Mol, A., I. Moser, and J. Pols. 2010a. Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Transcript Verlag.) by developing the notion of collective tinkering. An ethnographic study was conducted in two teams in community housing services for people with Intellectual Disabilities and Severe Mental Illness. Collective tinkering is analysed (1) within teams; (2) between professionals, family members and professionals from different organisations providing care for the same client; and (3) in organising practices for a collective of clients. Collective tinkering involves assembling goods into a care practice, attentively experimenting with these care practices, and adjusting care accordingly within a collective of those involved in care for a particular client (group). When collective tinkering does not occur, the stakeholders excluded (e.g. clients or family members) may experience poor quality of care.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N