Implementation of a hospital-wide multidisciplinary blunt chest injury care bundle (ChIP): Fidelity of delivery evaluation.

Ineffective intervention for patients with blunt chest wall injury results in high rates of morbidity and mortality. To address this, a blunt chest injury care bundle protocol (ChIP) was developed, and a multifaceted plan was implemented using the Behaviour Change Wheel. The purpose of this study wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Australian Critical Care Vol. 35; no. 2; pp. 113 - 123
Autores principales: Kourouche, Sarah, Curtis, Kate, Munroe, Belinda, Asha, Stephen Edward, Carey, Ian, Considine, Julie, Fry, Margaret, Lyons, Jack, Middleton, Sandy, Mitchell, Rebecca, Shaban, Ramon Z., Unsworth, Annalise, Buckley, Thomas
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Mar2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=155366002&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 155366002
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10367314
        GZL
      jtl: Australian Critical Care
      issn: 10367314
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2022
      vid: 35
      iid: 2
      pid: 467
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        155366002
        155366002
        155366002
        10.1016/j.aucc.2021.04.003
        155366002
      ppf: 113
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Implementation of a hospital-wide multidisciplinary blunt chest injury care bundle (ChIP): Fidelity of delivery evaluation.
      aug:
        au:
          Kourouche, Sarah
          Curtis, Kate
          Munroe, Belinda
          Asha, Stephen Edward
          Carey, Ian
          Considine, Julie
          Fry, Margaret
          Lyons, Jack
          Middleton, Sandy
          Mitchell, Rebecca
          Shaban, Ramon Z.
          Unsworth, Annalise
          Buckley, Thomas
        affil: Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Wounds, Nonpenetrating Therapy
          Thoracic Injuries Therapy
          Protocols
          Hospitals, Community Australia
          Human
          Australia
          Pretest-Posttest Design
          Implementation Science
          Patient Compliance
          Descriptive Statistics
          Confidence Intervals
          Odds Ratio
          Nasal Cannula
          Medical Practice, Evidence-Based
          Spirometry
          Analgesia
          Patient-Controlled Analgesia
          Conceptual Framework
          Behavioral Changes
      ab: Ineffective intervention for patients with blunt chest wall injury results in high rates of morbidity and mortality. To address this, a blunt chest injury care bundle protocol (ChIP) was developed, and a multifaceted plan was implemented using the Behaviour Change Wheel. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reach, fidelity, and dose of the ChIP intervention to discern if it was activated and delivered to patients as intended at two regional Australian hospitals. This is a pretest and post-test implementation evaluation study. The proportion of ChIP activations and adherence to ChIP components received by eligible patients were compared before and after intervention over a 4-year period. Sample medians were compared using the nonparametric median test, with 95% confidence intervals. Differences in proportions for categorical data were compared using the two-sample z-test. Over the 19-month postimplementation period, 97.1% (n = 440) of eligible patients received ChIP (reach). The median activation time was 134 min; there was no difference in time to activation between business hours and after-hours; time to activation was not associated with comorbidities and injury severity score. Compared with the preimplementation group, the postimplementation group were more likely to receive evidence-based treatments (dose), including high-flow nasal cannula use (odds ratio [OR] = 6.8 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 4.8–9.6]), incentive spirometry in the emergency department (OR = 7.5, [95% CI = 3.2–17.6]), regular analgesia (OR = 2.4 [95% CI = 1.5–3.8]), regional analgesia (OR = 2.8 [95% CI = 1.5–5.3]), patient-controlled analgesia (OR = 1.8 [95% CI = 1.3–2.4]), and multiple specialist team reviews, e.g., surgical review (OR = 9.9 [95% CI = 6.1–16.1]). High fidelity of delivery was achieved and sustained over 19 months for implementation of a complex intervention in the acute context through a robust implementation plan based on theoretical frameworks. There were significant and sustained improvements in care practices known to result in better patient outcomes. Findings from this evaluation can inform future implementation programs such as ChIP and other multidisciplinary interventions in an emergency or acute care context.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N