Comparing the performance of ultralight folding manual wheelchairs using standardized tests.

To evaluate ultralight folding manual wheelchairs (UFMWs) in order to produce comparative data on their strength, durability, stability and cost–benefit, and to determine progress of wheelchairs by comparing these results to results of past studies. Engineering testing using American National Standa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 40 - 50
Autores principales: Gebrosky, Benjamin, Bridge, Ann, O'Donnell, Shawn, Grindle, Garrettt G., Cooper, Rosemarie, Cooper, Rory A.
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jan2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=155402825&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 155402825
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        17483107
        1X04
      jtl: Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
      issn: 17483107
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2022
      vid: 17
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        155402825
        145562002
        155402825
        155402825
        10.1080/17483107.2020.1754928
        155402825
      ppf: 40
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Comparing the performance of ultralight folding manual wheelchairs using standardized tests.
      aug:
        au:
          Gebrosky, Benjamin
          Bridge, Ann
          O'Donnell, Shawn
          Grindle, Garrettt G.
          Cooper, Rosemarie
          Cooper, Rory A.
        affil: Human Engineering Research Laboratories, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Wheelchairs
          Equipment Design United States
          Materials Testing
          Human
          Cost Benefit Analysis
          Biomechanics
          Descriptive Statistics
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          Assistive Technology Devices
          United States
      ab: To evaluate ultralight folding manual wheelchairs (UFMWs) in order to produce comparative data on their strength, durability, stability and cost–benefit, and to determine progress of wheelchairs by comparing these results to results of past studies. Engineering testing using American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA) standards. Laboratory testing of UFMW stability, and static, impact and fatigue strength performance with three devices using ANSI/RESNA standardized tests. The three wheelchair models were the TiLite Aero X (Permobil, Lebanon, TN), Sunrise Medical Quickie 2 (Fresno, CA) and Ki Mobility Catalyst 5 (Stevens Point, WI). ANSI/RESNA standardized tests. Mass and critical measurements, static stability, static strength, impact strength, fatigue strength and cost analysis. The ultralight folding wheelchairs continued to outperform their lightweight and rigid framed counterparts. According to these data, the quality of ultralight wheelchairs has not declined over the past 10 years. The Ki Catalyst did not pass strength and durability testing, while the TiLite Aero X and Sunrise Medical Quickie 2 surpassed these tests. This result exemplifies the need for ongoing research to identify whether wheelchairs satisfy ANSI/RESNA testing requirements and highlights the importance of creating a resource data set. This is particularly important when numerous other wheelchairs fail to meet minimum ANSI/RESNA requirements. Folding frame wheelchairs offer benefits such as transportability and convenience that may benefit certain wheelchair users, assuming their durability is sufficient and they provide similar benefits vs. other wheelchair construction. Previous studies have shown that folding wheelchairs perform meet the minimum requirements of standardized testing, and it is important to see if durability has increased, decreased or remained the same over the years. Other wheelchair types have remained stagnant with respect to durability and are less likely to meet the minimum durability requirements. Durable devices will improve a wheelchair user's quality of life by reducing downtime while waiting for repairs, and also reduce the likelihood of injury due to component failure.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N