COMPARING TRADITIONAL METHODS FOR SELECTING CLASS INTERVALS ON CHOROPLETH MAPS*.

The most common goat when classing data for choropleth maps is to create homogeneous classes which contain similar data values. None of the four traditional data classing methods examined here (quartile, equal interval, standard deviation, and natural breaks) consistently generalized the experimenta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Professional Geographer Vol. 38; no. 1; pp. 62 - 68
Main Author: Smith, Richard M.
Format: Article
Published: Taylor & Francis Ltd Feb86
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=15546786&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 15546786
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00330124
        PGG
      jtl: Professional Geographer
      issn: 00330124
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb86
      vid: 38
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        15546786
        10.1111/j.0033-0124.1986.00062.x
      ppf: 62
      ppct: 6
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: COMPARING TRADITIONAL METHODS FOR SELECTING CLASS INTERVALS ON CHOROPLETH MAPS*.
      aug:
        au: Smith, Richard M.
        affil: University of Arkansas
      su:
        Geography -- Statistical methods
        Historical maps
        Data analysis
        Standard deviations
        Analysis of variance
        Distribution (Probability theory)
        Geographical research
      sug:
        subj:
          Geography -- Statistical methods
          Historical maps
          Data analysis
          Standard deviations
          Analysis of variance
          Distribution (Probability theory)
          Geographical research
      keyword:
        class intervals
        classing accuracy
        optimization classing
      ab: The most common goat when classing data for choropleth maps is to create homogeneous classes which contain similar data values. None of the four traditional data classing methods examined here (quartile, equal interval, standard deviation, and natural breaks) consistently generalized the experimental data sets into homogeneous classes. These methods were most accurate for data sets with specific distributional characteristics, but none classed all of any type of distribution accurately. Only the optimization method produced reliable and accurate results for all of the experimental data.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1986
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N