Visual Word Recognition: Attention, Intention, Context, and Processing Dynamics.
The notion that some mental processes are "automatic" while others are "controlled" is a distinction that appears in virtually all cognition textbooks, as well as in thousands of papers and book chapters. Indeed, so entrenched is the automatic side of this distinction that various leading computatio...
| Publicado en: | Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale Vol. 76; no. 1; pp. 57 - 75 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Canadian Psychological Association
Mar2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=155501148&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 155501148 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 11961961 CJX jtl: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale issn: 11961961 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2022 vid: 76 iid: 1 pid: 98 pub: Canadian Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 155501148 10.1037/cep0000274 ppf: 57 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.9MB tig: atl: Visual Word Recognition: Attention, Intention, Context, and Processing Dynamics. aug: au: Besner, Derek affil: Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo su: Computer simulation Cognition Attention Thought & thinking Word recognition Benchmarking (Management) Visual perception Intention sug: subj: Computer simulation Cognition Attention Thought & thinking Word recognition Benchmarking (Management) Visual perception Intention keyword: attention context intention processing dynamics visual word identification contexte dynamique de traitement reconnaissance visuelle des mots attention context intention processing dynamics visual word identification contexte dynamique de traitement reconnaissance visuelle des mots ab: The notion that some mental processes are "automatic" while others are "controlled" is a distinction that appears in virtually all cognition textbooks, as well as in thousands of papers and book chapters. Indeed, so entrenched is the automatic side of this distinction that various leading computational accounts make no mention of it, but instead assume it implicitly. These models, and the field more generally, assume that processing is stimulus triggered and does not need any form of attention or an intention as a preliminary. Further, the fundamental processing dynamics underlying such automatic processing is widely seen as consisting of interactive activation and autonomous in that it unfolds in the same way across contexts. I review a number of findings from my lab that lead me to a different conclusion. Visual word recognition requires a consideration and integrated understanding of automaticity, attention, intention, context, and cognitive processing. I present various findings that challenge the preeminent role ascribed to interactive activation as implemented in the dominant computational models. I conclude that, going forward, the time is due for computational models of visual word recognition (and researchers in the field more generally) to acknowledge that the findings reported here constitute benchmarks that constrain theory and present opportunities for making meaningful advances in our understanding of visual word recognition (and perhaps of cognition more generally). A few proposals for how we might think about some of these processes are offered. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|