Piloting a Smart Rollator: User experiences with technology-related motivation and physical activity.

Background: Improved life expectancy combined with suboptimal physical activity (PA) represents an increasingly salient public health challenge among the elderly. PA in late life is associated with fewer health problems in old age. Assistive information and communication technology might improve PA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Gerontechnology Vol. 20; no. 2; pp. 1 - 11
Autores principales: Orenius, Tage, Paloniemi, Susanna, Hurri, Heikki, Kuusisto, Olli, Ristolainen, Leena, Tolonen, Antti, Seisto, Anu, Sourkatti, Heba, Sachinopoulou, Anna, Leppänen, Tapio, Cluitmans, Luc, Urhemaa, Timo, Railo-Granfelt, Anne, Balatsas-Lekkas, Angelos, van Gils, Mark
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: International Society for Gerontechnology 2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=155637513&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 155637513
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15691101
        904R
      jtl: Gerontechnology
      issn: 15691101
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2021
      vid: 20
      iid: 2
      pid: 54298
      pub: International Society for Gerontechnology
    artinfo:
      ui:
        155637513
        155637513
        155637513
        10.4017/gt.2021.20.2.420.01
        155637513
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Piloting a Smart Rollator: User experiences with technology-related motivation and physical activity.
      aug:
        au:
          Orenius, Tage
          Paloniemi, Susanna
          Hurri, Heikki
          Kuusisto, Olli
          Ristolainen, Leena
          Tolonen, Antti
          Seisto, Anu
          Sourkatti, Heba
          Sachinopoulou, Anna
          Leppänen, Tapio
          Cluitmans, Luc
          Urhemaa, Timo
          Railo-Granfelt, Anne
          Balatsas-Lekkas, Angelos
          van Gils, Mark
        affil: Research Institute Orton, Helsinki, Finland
      sug:
        subj:
          Physical Activity In Old Age
          Motivation In Old Age
          Technology, Medical In Old Age
          Consumer Attitudes
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Pilot Studies
          Crossover Design
          Prospective Studies
          Questionnaires
          Usability Study
          Interviews
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Improved life expectancy combined with suboptimal physical activity (PA) represents an increasingly salient public health challenge among the elderly. PA in late life is associated with fewer health problems in old age. Assistive information and communication technology might improve PA and alleviate health problems among the elderly. Objective: This pilot study aimed to quantitatively measure the motivational aspects related to rollator use and, by using qualitative interviews, outline how a Smart Rollator solution would motivate older adults to increase their PA in their everyday lives. Method: A total of 19 subjects between the ages of 63 and 91 years participated in the study. Half of the participants started in a setting in which the application did not provide feedback to the user, and the other half received feedback. A transition occurred (ordinary rollator to Smart Rollator and vice versa) after two months of usage. Motivational aspects were measured before the use of the rollator and after four months. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 participants to acquire information about their experiences. Results: On the motivation questionnaire, self-perceived mental vitality showed a significant decrease at follow-up, but the total score did not change. Three different types of Smart Rollator users were identified based on the interview data: enthusiastic, practical, and disappointed users. The user types differed from each other, especially regarding user experiences concerning the smart features and intelligent features of the rollator. Conclusion: We conclude that the individual variations in terms of benefiting from the use of the Smart Rollator were large and that some users reported clear advantages using the Smart Rollator. The Smart Rollator elicited emotional reactions and affection, as well as frustration if the user was not able to benefit from the Smart Rollator as expected. Larger sample size is warranted to thoroughly specify the relations between the use of a Smart Rollator, user experiences, and PA.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N