User involvement in R&D in the field of Gerontechnology - Where does it go?...International Society for Gerontechnology's (ISG) 12th World Conference of Gerontechnology, October 6-9, 2020 (Virtual)

Purpose A recurring critique within the field of Gerontechnology is the comparably low market success in view of resources invested in research and design (Neven & Peine, 201 7). Several authors argue that this is caused, among others, by the lack of user involvement (Bjering, Curry & Maeder, 2014)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Gerontechnology Vol. 19; pp. 3 - 4
Autor principal: Merkel, S.
Formato: abstract proceedings research systematic review Journal Article
Publicado: International Society for Gerontechnology 2020 Supplement
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=155639892&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 155639892
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15691101
        904R
      jtl: Gerontechnology
      issn: 15691101
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2020 Supplement
      vid: 19
      pid: 54298
      pub: International Society for Gerontechnology
    artinfo:
      ui:
        155639892
        155639892
        155639892
        10.4017/gt.2020.19.s.69922.2
        155639892
      ppf: 3
      ppct: 1
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: User involvement in R&D in the field of Gerontechnology - Where does it go?...International Society for Gerontechnology's (ISG) 12th World Conference of Gerontechnology, October 6-9, 2020 (Virtual)
      aug:
        au: Merkel, S.
        affil: Institute for Work and Technology, Germany
      sug:
        subj:
          Gerontologic Care
          Assistive Technology Devices
          Research
          Equipment Design
          Consumer Participation
          Congresses and Conferences
      ab: Purpose A recurring critique within the field of Gerontechnology is the comparably low market success in view of resources invested in research and design (Neven & Peine, 201 7). Several authors argue that this is caused, among others, by the lack of user involvement (Bjering, Curry & Maeder, 2014). Development and design processes of products for older people follow the same logic as in general product development. Recently, a debate started to question these 'classical' innovation processes, arguing that these do not properly take into account the characteristics and needs of older people. Particularly, the mismatch between designed properties of older people and the variety of situations in which they are used has been criticized by researchers in the field of social gerontechnology (Giaccardi, Kuijer & Neven, 201 6). This leads to the question on how these processes are organized and which role older people play in those. There are approaches and concepts specifically focusing on the field of Gerontechnology (Demirbilek & Demirkan, 2004; Kunemund, 2018). However, there seems to be a discrepancy between theoretical approaches and practical implementation (Merkel & Kucharski, 2018). Method We conducted a systematic literature review on participatory design in Gerontechnology (Merkel & Kucharski, 2018). In this review, we included 26 studies matching our inclusion criteria. We updated and extended this literature review by specifically looking at research and design processes reported in those studies and theoretical approaches. Results and Discussion Based on the literature review, we show that design studies in the field of Gerontechnology focus only on certain phases of design processes and seldom report a whole R&D process. Although characteristics of the field of Gerontechnology and hence older people seem to be increasingly acknowledged, methods applied do not pay attention to the concerns and criticism by scholars from social Gerontechnology. We argue in favor of new R&D approaches and restructured processes and provide a first draft of a conceptual design framework.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        abstract
        proceedings
        research
        systematic review
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N