Behavioral response bias and event‐related brain potentials implicate elevated incentive salience attribution to alcohol cues in emerging adults with lower sensitivity to alcohol.

Aims: This study used a behavioral approach‐avoidance task including images of alcoholic beverages to test whether low sensitivity to alcohol (LS) is a phenotypical marker of a dispositional propensity to attribute bottom‐up incentive value to naturally conditioned alcohol cues. Design, setting and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Addiction Vol. 117; no. 4; pp. 892 - 905
Autores principales: Cofresí, Roberto U., Kohen, Casey B., Motschman, Courtney A., Wiers, Reinout W., Piasecki, Thomas M., Bartholow, Bruce D.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Apr2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=155656571&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 155656571
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09652140
        AIO
      jtl: Addiction
      issn: 09652140
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2022
      vid: 117
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        155656571
        153512018
        155656571
        155656571
        10.1111/add.15728
        155656571
      ppf: 892
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Behavioral response bias and event‐related brain potentials implicate elevated incentive salience attribution to alcohol cues in emerging adults with lower sensitivity to alcohol.
      aug:
        au:
          Cofresí, Roberto U.
          Kohen, Casey B.
          Motschman, Courtney A.
          Wiers, Reinout W.
          Piasecki, Thomas M.
          Bartholow, Bruce D.
        affil: Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia MO,, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Evoked Potentials In Adulthood
          Behavior
          Alcohol Abuse
          Human
          Young Adult
          Experimental Studies
          Missouri
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Electroencephalography
          Linear Regression
          Multimethod Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Conflict (Psychology)
          Large-Scale Brain Networks
          Sign Test
      ab: Aims: This study used a behavioral approach‐avoidance task including images of alcoholic beverages to test whether low sensitivity to alcohol (LS) is a phenotypical marker of a dispositional propensity to attribute bottom‐up incentive value to naturally conditioned alcohol cues. Design, setting and participants: Experimental study with a measured individual difference variable at a university psychology laboratory in Missouri, MO, USA. Participants were 178 emerging adults (aged 18–20 years) varying in self‐reported sensitivity to alcohol's acute effects. Measurements Participants completed the alcohol approach‐avoidance task while behavior (response time; RT) and the electroencephalogram (EEG) were recorded. Stimulus‐locked event‐related potentials (ERPs) provided indices of integrated (top‐down and bottom‐up) stimulus incentive value (P3 amplitude) and conflict between top‐down task demands and bottom‐up response propensities (N450 amplitude). Findings Linear mixed models showed faster RT for 'alcohol‐approach' relative to 'alcohol‐avoid' trials for lower‐sensitivity (LS) [meanD ± standard errorD (MD ± SED) = 29.51 ± 9.74 ms, t(328) = 3.03, P = 0.003] but not higher‐sensitivity (HS) individuals (MD ± SED = 2.27 ± 9.33 ms, t(328) = 0.243, P = 0.808). There was enhanced N450 amplitude (response conflict) for alcohol‐avoid relative to alcohol‐approach trials for LS participants (MD ± SED = 0.811 ± 0.198 μV, Z = 4.108, P < 0.001) and enhanced N450 amplitude for alcohol‐approach relative to alcohol‐avoid for HS participants (MD ± SED = 0.419 ± 0.188 μV, Z = 2.235, P = 0.025). There was also enhanced P3 amplitude for alcohol‐approach relative to alcohol‐avoid for LS (MD ± SED = 0.825 ± 0.204 μV, Z = 4.045, P < 0.001) but not HS (MD ± SED = 0.013 ± 0.194 μV, Z = 0.068, P = 0.946). Conclusions: Findings from a human laboratory study appear to support the notion that low sensitivity to alcohol indexes a propensity to attribute bottom–up incentive value to naturally conditioned alcohol cues.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N