Comparative effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in older patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Pivotal CRT trials enrolled patients with HFrEF significantly younger than the typical contemporary patient with HFrEF. Thus, the risks and benefits in this older population with HFrEF are largely unknown. We sought to perform meta-analyses comparing safety and effectiveness of cardiac r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Cardiac Failure Vol. 28; no. 3; pp. 443 - 453
Autores principales: Juggan, Saeed, Ponnamreddy, Praveen K., Reilly, Clifford A., Dodge, Shayne E., Gilstrap, Lauren G., Zeitler, Emily P.
Formato: meta analysis research systematic review Journal Article
Publicado: W B Saunders Mar2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=155665870&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 155665870
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10719164
        DOP
      jtl: Journal of Cardiac Failure
      issn: 10719164
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2022
      vid: 28
      iid: 3
      pid: 1351
      pub: W B Saunders
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        155665870
        155665870
        NLM34774750
        155665870
        10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.10.013
        NLM34774750
        155665870
      ppf: 443
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Comparative effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in older patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
      aug:
        au:
          Juggan, Saeed
          Ponnamreddy, Praveen K.
          Reilly, Clifford A.
          Dodge, Shayne E.
          Gilstrap, Lauren G.
          Zeitler, Emily P.
        affil: From the Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
      sug:
        subj:
          Heart Failure Therapy
          Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Methods
          Heart Failure Diagnosis
          Ventricular Dysfunction, Left Therapy
          Ventricular Function, Left
          Stroke Volume
          Aged
          Human
          Treatment Outcomes
          Adult
          Comparative Studies
          Meta Analysis
          Multicenter Studies
          Evaluation Research
          Systematic Review
          Aged: 65+ years
          Adult: 19-44 years
      ab: Background: Pivotal CRT trials enrolled patients with HFrEF significantly younger than the typical contemporary patient with HFrEF. Thus, the risks and benefits in this older population with HFrEF are largely unknown. We sought to perform meta-analyses comparing safety and effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in older vs younger patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).Methods and Results: PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science were queried for comparative effectiveness studies of CRT in older patients with HFrEF. Title, abstract, and full-text screening was performed to identify studies comparing at least 1 prespecified end point between older and younger adult patients with at least 50 participants. Random effects meta-analysis in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) mean difference (older minus younger) and the relative risk (RR) of death, improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and complications are reported along with estimates of heterogeneity. In 7 studies, there was similar LVEF improvement between groups (mean difference 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.04 to 2.32, P = .06, I2 = 53%). Older patients were equally likely as younger patients to see an improvement in NYHA functional class of at least 1 in 6 studies (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93-1.06, P = .76, I2 = 25%). No significant differences in the incidence of hematoma, pneumothorax, lead dislodgment, cardiac perforation, or infection requiring explant was observed. The RR of mortality in 11 studies demonstrated higher risk of all-cause mortality in older patients (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.08, P < .01, I2 = 0%).Conclusions: Compared with younger patients, older patients receiving CRT were equally likely to experience improvement in LVEF, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and NYHA functional class. There was no difference in procedural complications. The higher rate of all-cause mortality in older patients likely reflects a greater underlying risk of death from competing causes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        meta analysis
        research
        systematic review
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N