Cardiac CT and MRI radiomics: systematic review of the literature and radiomics quality score assessment.

Objective: To systematically review and evaluate the methodological quality of studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) radiomics for cardiac applications.Methods: Multiple medical literature archives (PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE) were systematically searche...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Radiology Vol. 32; no. 4; pp. 2629 - 2639
Autores principales: Ponsiglione, Andrea, Stanzione, Arnaldo, Cuocolo, Renato, Ascione, Raffaele, Gambardella, Michele, De Giorgi, Marco, Nappi, Carmela, Cuocolo, Alberto, Imbriaco, Massimo
Formato: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Apr2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=155758994&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 155758994
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09387994
        NPH
      jtl: European Radiology
      issn: 09387994
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2022
      vid: 32
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        155758994
        155758994
        NLM34812912
        155758994
        10.1007/s00330-021-08375-x
        NLM34812912
        155758994
      ppf: 2629
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Cardiac CT and MRI radiomics: systematic review of the literature and radiomics quality score assessment.
      aug:
        au:
          Ponsiglione, Andrea
          Stanzione, Arnaldo
          Cuocolo, Renato
          Ascione, Raffaele
          Gambardella, Michele
          De Giorgi, Marco
          Nappi, Carmela
          Cuocolo, Alberto
          Imbriaco, Massimo
        affil: Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
      sug:
        subj:
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods
          Tomography, X-Ray Computed
          Human
          Radiography
          Scales
          Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index
      ab: Objective: To systematically review and evaluate the methodological quality of studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) radiomics for cardiac applications.Methods: Multiple medical literature archives (PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE) were systematically searched to retrieve original studies focused on cardiac MRI and CT radiomics applications. Two researchers in consensus assessed each investigation using the radiomics quality score (RQS). Subgroup analyses were performed to assess whether the total RQS varied according to study aim, journal quartile, imaging modality, and first author category.Results: From a total of 1961 items, 53 articles were finally included in the analysis. Overall, the studies reached a median total RQS of 7 (IQR, 4-12), corresponding to a percentage score of 19.4% (IQR, 11.1-33.3%). Item scores were particularly low due to lack of prospective design, cost-effectiveness analysis, and open science. Median RQS percentage score was significantly higher in papers where the first author was a medical doctor and in those published on first quartile journals.Conclusions: The overall methodological quality of radiomics studies in cardiac MRI and CT is still lacking. A higher degree of standardization of the radiomics workflow and higher publication standards for studies are required to allow its translation into clinical practice.Key Points: • RQS has been recently proposed for the overall assessment of the methodological quality of radiomics-based studies. • The 53 included studies on cardiac MRI and CT radiomics applications reached a median total RQS of 7 (IQR, 4-12), corresponding to a percentage of 19.4% (IQR, 11.1-33.3%). • A more standardized methodology in the radiomics workflow is needed, especially in terms of study design, validation, and open science, in order to translate the results to clinical applications.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N