Who owns the pipes? Utility ownership, infrastructure conditions, and methane emissions in United States natural gas distribution.

Critical infrastructure systems that provide local public services are owned by a complicated array of public and private entities that are subject to disparate regulatory regimes. Determining whether and why performance differences between public and private service providers emerge in these differ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Review of Policy Research Vol. 39; no. 2; pp. 170 - 199
Autores principales: Scott, Ryan P., Scott, Tyler A., Greer, Robert A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Mar2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=155837595&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 155837595
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1541132X
        MJJ
      jtl: Review of Policy Research
      issn: 1541132X
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2022
      vid: 39
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        155837595
        10.1111/ropr.12463
      ppf: 170
      ppct: 29
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 732KB
      tig:
        atl: Who owns the pipes? Utility ownership, infrastructure conditions, and methane emissions in United States natural gas distribution.
      aug:
        au:
          Scott, Ryan P.
          Scott, Tyler A.
          Greer, Robert A.
        affil:
          Department of Political Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins Colorado,, USA
          Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, Davis California,, USA
          Bush School of Government & Public Service, Texas A&M University, College Station Texas,, USA
      su:
        United States
        Infrastructure (Economics)
        Municipal services
        Gas distribution
        Industrial concentration
        Methane
        Leaks (Disclosure of information)
      sug:
        subj:
          Infrastructure (Economics)
          Municipal services
          United States
          Natural Gas Distribution
          Conventional oil and gas extraction
          Administration of Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management Programs
          Administration of Housing Programs
          Administration of Public Health Programs
          Administration of Urban Planning and Community and Rural Development
          Other local, municipal and regional public administration
          Gas distribution
          Industrial concentration
          Methane
          Leaks (Disclosure of information)
      keyword:
        leakage
        methane emissions
        natural gas
        ownership
        publicness
        utilities
        emisiones de metano
        Fugas
        Gas natural
        propiedad
        publicidad
        servicios públicos
        公共性
        公用事业
        天然气
        所有权
        泄露
        甲烷排放
        leakage
        methane emissions
        natural gas
        ownership
        publicness
        utilities
        emisiones de metano
        Fugas
        Gas natural
        propiedad
        publicidad
        servicios públicos
        公共性
        公用事业
        天然气
        所有权
        泄露
        甲烷排放
      ab: Critical infrastructure systems that provide local public services are owned by a complicated array of public and private entities that are subject to disparate regulatory regimes. Determining whether and why performance differences between public and private service providers emerge in these different contexts is critical for understanding the efficacy of current management efforts and informing policy choices about how to deal with public and private service providers. This paper analyzes a census of all U.S. gas distributors and a more detailed sample of the largest utilities in the United States to model how sector and regional market concentration relate to infrastructure quality and leak volumes. Using safety reports, market data, and yearly infrastructure records submitted by gas distributors from 2010 to 2017, the article uses a series of Bayesian hierarchical models to show that publicly owned utilities report lower quality infrastructure (i.e., operation of pipelines with lower quality materials), but also self‐report significantly lower leak rates, all else equal. The article concludes by discussing potential explanations for this discrepancy, including the capital investment incentives private utilities face under cost‐of‐service pricing regulations and the fact that performance measurement capacity is itself a potential outgrowth of increased investment and expenditures.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N