Jesus and Judaism (trans. Wayne Coppins). Baylor‐Mohr Siebeck Studies in Early Christianity (BMSEC) [7].
It is strange, though, that a consideration of the working presuppositions of Josephus is lacking ( I à la i Harold Attridge, for example), and the best Josephan account of Jesus, uncovered from the Arabic version by the Jewish scholar Shlomo Pines (1971), more reserved not tampered with like the Gr...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Religious History Vol. 46; no. 1; pp. 254 - 256 |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Book Review |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Mar2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=155950009&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 155950009 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00224227 53N jtl: Journal of Religious History issn: 00224227 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Mar2022 vid: 46 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 155950009 10.1111/1467-9809.12834 ppf: 254 ppct: 2 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 75KB tig: atl: Jesus and Judaism (trans. Wayne Coppins). Baylor‐Mohr Siebeck Studies in Early Christianity (BMSEC) [7]. aug: su: Jesus Christ Judaism Primitive & early church, ca. 30-600 Phronesis Resurrection sug: subj: Jesus Christ Judaism Primitive & early church, ca. 30-600 Phronesis Resurrection ab: It is strange, though, that a consideration of the working presuppositions of Josephus is lacking ( I à la i Harold Attridge, for example), and the best Josephan account of Jesus, uncovered from the Arabic version by the Jewish scholar Shlomo Pines (1971), more reserved not tampered with like the Greek text, was surely worth probing. We get a detailed account of Galilee at the time, and Nazareth in particular, the family of Jesus, and then the genealogical associations and epithets put upon Jesus in Jewish terms. Hengel and Schwemer offer convincing rebuttals to old critics of the Gospel traditions (David Strauss, Robert Eisler, etc.) while explaining which studies have weathered the test of time. pubtype: Review doctype: Book Review src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Journal of Religious History is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Journal of Religious History holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2022 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|