Channels for Common Ground.

One potentially ethically relevant feature of an utterance is that utterance's influence on the likelihoods that our future discourses wind up with one Stalnakerian 'common ground' or body of shared information rather than another. Such likelihoods matter ethically, so the ways our utterances influe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy & Phenomenological Research Vol. 104; no. 1; pp. 171 - 186
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jan2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=156030527&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 156030527
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318205
        PPO
      jtl: Philosophy & Phenomenological Research
      issn: 00318205
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2022
      vid: 104
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        156030527
        10.1111/phpr.12741
      ppf: 171
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 673KB
      tig:
        atl: Channels for Common Ground.
      aug:
      su:
        Ethics
        Information sharing
        Language & languages
        Likelihood ratio tests
        Probability theory
      sug:
        subj:
          Ethics
          Information sharing
          Language & languages
          Likelihood ratio tests
          Probability theory
      ab: One potentially ethically relevant feature of an utterance is that utterance's influence on the likelihoods that our future discourses wind up with one Stalnakerian 'common ground' or body of shared information rather than another. Such likelihoods matter ethically, so the ways our utterances influence them can matter ethically, despite the fact that such influences are often unintended, and often hard to see. By offering a relatively neutral descriptive framework that can enhance our collective sensitivity to and discussion of ethically, socially, and politically important features of language use, this paper contributes to the ethics of language use. It discusses ways in which utterances can influence the likelihoods of future common grounds by deploying one system of categorization rather than another, and argues that language's effects on the evolution of discourse can affect the paths to and probabilities of different sorts of consensus.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy & Phenomenological Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy & Phenomenological Research
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N