GLA:D® Back Australia: a mixed methods feasibility study for implementation.

Background: Practice-based guidelines recommend patient education and exercise as first-line care for low back pain (LBP); however, these recommendations are not routinely delivered in practice. GLA:D® Back, developed in Denmark to assist clinicians to implement guideline recommendations, offers a s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 1 - 13
Autores principales: Fernandez, Matthew, Young, Anika, Kongsted, Alice, Hartvigsen, Jan, Barton, Christian, Wallis, Jason, Kent, Peter, Kawchuk, Greg, Jenkins, Hazel, Hancock, Mark, French, Simon D.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: BioMed Central 4/7/2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=156192065&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 156192065
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        2045709X
        BG1Z
      jtl: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
      issn: 2045709X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 4/7/2022
      vid: 30
      iid: 1
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        156192065
        156192065
        156192065
        10.1186/s12998-022-00427-3
        156192065
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: GLA:D® Back Australia: a mixed methods feasibility study for implementation.
      aug:
        au:
          Fernandez, Matthew
          Young, Anika
          Kongsted, Alice
          Hartvigsen, Jan
          Barton, Christian
          Wallis, Jason
          Kent, Peter
          Kawchuk, Greg
          Jenkins, Hazel
          Hancock, Mark
          French, Simon D.
        affil: School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Brisbane, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Low Back Pain Education
          Implementation Science
          Human
          Australia
          Chiropractors
          Physical Therapists
          Pilot Studies
          Multimethod Studies
          Course Evaluation
      ab: Background: Practice-based guidelines recommend patient education and exercise as first-line care for low back pain (LBP); however, these recommendations are not routinely delivered in practice. GLA:D® Back, developed in Denmark to assist clinicians to implement guideline recommendations, offers a structured education and supervised exercise program for people with LBP in addition to a clinical registry to evaluate patient outcomes. In this study we evaluated the feasibility of implementing the GLA:D® Back program in Australia. We considered clinician and patient recruitment and retention, program fidelity, exploring clinicians' and patients' experiences with the program, and participant outcome data collection. Methods: Clinicians (chiropractors and physiotherapists) were recruited and participated in a 2-day GLA:D® Back training course. Patients were eligible to participate if they had persistent or recurrent LBP. Feasibility domains included the ability to: (1) recruit clinicians to undergo training; (2) recruit and retain patients in the program; (3) observe program fidelity; and (4) perceive barriers and facilitators for GLA:D® Back implementation. We also collected data related to: (5) clinician confidence, attitudes, and behaviour; and (6) patient self-reported outcomes related to pain, disability, and performance tests. Results: Twenty clinicians (8 chiropractors, 12 physiotherapists) participated in the training, with 55% (11/20) offering GLA:D® Back to their patients. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in the program, with 67% (38/57) attending the final follow-up assessment. Loss to follow up was mainly due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. We observed program fidelity, with clinicians generally delivering the program as intended. Interviews revealed two clinician themes related to: (i) intervention acceptability; and (ii) barriers and facilitators to implementation. Patient interviews revealed themes related to: (i) intervention acceptability; and (ii) program efficacy. At 3 months follow-up, clinicians demonstrated high treatment confidence and biomedical orientation. Patient outcomes trended towards improvement. Conclusion: GLA:D® Back implementation in Australia appears feasible based on clinician recruitment, program acceptability and potential benefits for patient outcomes from the small sample of participating clinicians and patients. However, COVID-19 impacted patient recruitment, retention, and data collection. To scale-up GLA:D® Back in private and public settings, further work is warranted to address associated barriers, and to leverage facilitators.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N