The impact of cognitive load on prospective and retrospective time estimates at long durations: An investigation using a visual and memory search paradigm.

As human beings, we are bound by time. It is essential for daily functioning, and yet our ability to keep track of time is influenced by a myriad of factors (Block & Zakay, 1997, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4[2], 184–197). First and foremost, time estimation has been found to depend on whether pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Memory & Cognition Vol. 50; no. 4; pp. 837 - 852
Main Authors: Walker, Jesika A., Aswad, Mohammed, Lacroix, Guy
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature May2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=156400115&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 156400115
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0090502X
        MEG
      jtl: Memory & Cognition
      issn: 0090502X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2022
      vid: 50
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        156400115
        10.3758/s13421-021-01241-7
      ppf: 837
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 782KB
      tig:
        atl: The impact of cognitive load on prospective and retrospective time estimates at long durations: An investigation using a visual and memory search paradigm.
      aug:
        au:
          Walker, Jesika A.
          Aswad, Mohammed
          Lacroix, Guy
        affil:
          School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, 136 Jean-Jacques Lussier, K1N 6N5, Ottawa, ON, Canada
          Department of Psychology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Dr, K1S 5B6, Ottawa, ON, Canada
      su:
        Memory
        Judgment (Psychology)
        Cognition
        Task performance
        Retrospective studies
        Time
        Visual perception
        Longitudinal method
      sug:
        subj:
          Memory
          Judgment (Psychology)
          Cognition
          Task performance
          Retrospective studies
          Time
          Visual perception
          Longitudinal method
      keyword:
        Cognitive load
        Task duration
        Time estimation
        Visual and memory search
        Cognitive load
        Task duration
        Time estimation
        Visual and memory search
      ab: As human beings, we are bound by time. It is essential for daily functioning, and yet our ability to keep track of time is influenced by a myriad of factors (Block & Zakay, 1997, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4[2], 184–197). First and foremost, time estimation has been found to depend on whether participants estimate the time prospectively or retrospectively (Hicks et al., 1976, The American Journal of Psychology, 89[4], 719–730). However, there is a paucity of research investigating differences between these two conditions in tasks over two minutes (Tobin et al., 2010, PLOS ONE, 5[2], Article e9271). Moreover, estimates have also been shown to be influenced by cognitive load. We thus investigated participants' ability to keep track of time during a visual and memory search task and manipulated its difficulty and duration. Two hundred and ninety-two participants performed the task for 8 or 58 minutes. Participants in the prospective time judgment condition were forewarned of an impending time estimate, whereas participants in the retrospective condition were not. Cognitive load was manipulated and assessed by altering the task's difficulty. The results revealed a higher overestimation of time in the prospective condition compared with the retrospective condition. However, this was found in the 8-minute task only. Overall, participants significantly overestimated the duration of the 8-minute task and underestimated the 58-minute task. Finally, cognitive load had no effect on participants' time estimates. Thus, the well-known cross-over interaction between cognitive load and estimation paradigm (Block et al., 2010, Acta Psychologica, 134[3], 330–343) did not extend to a longer duration in this experiment.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N