The Intuitive-Override Model: Nudging Judges Toward Pretrial Risk Assessment Instruments.
HOW DO JUDGES make pretrial releasedecisions? Unsurprisingly, judges' perceptions of theutility of the risk assessment instrument werestrongly shaped by the overlap between theinformation they considered valuable whenexercising their decision-making and theinformation used to complete the risk asses...
| Publicado en: | Federal Probation Vol. 85; no. 2; pp. 22 - 32 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Superintendent of Documents
Sep2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=156472883&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 156472883 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00149128 FEP jtl: Federal Probation issn: 00149128 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Sep2021 vid: 85 iid: 2 pid: 372 pub: Superintendent of Documents artinfo: ui: 156472883 ppf: 22 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: T tig: atl: The Intuitive-Override Model: Nudging Judges Toward Pretrial Risk Assessment Instruments. aug: au: DeMichele, Matthew Comfort, Megan Barrick, Kelle Baumgartner, Peter affil: Senior Research Sociologist, RTI International Senior Research Sociologist Youth, Violence Prevention, and Community Justice Program RTI International Senior Research Criminologist, Division for Applied Justice Research, RTI International Senior Research Data Scientist, RTI International su: Cultural pluralism Pretrial release Domestic violence Criminal justice system Risk assessment Legal professions sug: subj: Cultural pluralism Pretrial release Domestic violence Criminal justice system Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities Risk assessment Legal professions ab: HOW DO JUDGES make pretrial releasedecisions? Unsurprisingly, judges' perceptions of theutility of the risk assessment instrument werestrongly shaped by the overlap between theinformation they considered valuable whenexercising their decision-making and theinformation used to complete the risk assessment. Although we did not assessthe changes in prediction errors when usingthe instrument, another judge described herdesire to understand the nature of the researchby stating that it would be helpful to see probabilitiesof positive outcomes: It would not be helpful for judges to seeactual probabilities of people for an FTAor a new crime. Judicial Decision Making Nearly 90 years ago, the legal scholar JeromeFrank (1930) observed that judges basetheir decisions on hunches, and "whateverproduces judges' hunches makes the law."Frank recognized the importance of judicialsubjectivity and intuition when making decisions. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|