Reasons for unsuccessful research submissions to JAAPA.

Objective: PA authors face many barriers to publication and may benefit from additional transparency in the editorial decision-making process. This study examined the most common reasons for rejection of original research submissions to JAAPA. Methods: Senior JAAPA editors conducted a thematic analy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:JAAPA: Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins) Vol. 35; no. 5; pp. 54 - 57
Autores principales: Reed, Harrison M PA-C, Dehn, Richard W. MPA, PA-C, DFAAPA, Bushardt, Reamer L. PharmD, PA-C, DFAAPA
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins May2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=156555218&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 156555218
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15471896
        FY40
      jtl: JAAPA: Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins)
      issn: 15471896
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2022
      vid: 35
      iid: 5
      pid: 433
      pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      place: Baltimore, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        156555218
        156555218
        156555218
        10.1097/01.JAA.0000824948.31791.0b
        156555218
      ppf: 54
      ppct: 3
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Reasons for unsuccessful research submissions to JAAPA.
      aug:
        au:
          Reed, Harrison M PA-C
          Dehn, Richard W. MPA, PA-C, DFAAPA
          Bushardt, Reamer L. PharmD, PA-C, DFAAPA
      sug:
        subj:
          Writing for Publication Standards
          Scholarship
          Diaries Education
          Human
          Thematic Analysis
          Manuscripts
          Research Methodology
          Teaching
          Sampling Error
          Publication Bias
      ab: Objective: PA authors face many barriers to publication and may benefit from additional transparency in the editorial decision-making process. This study examined the most common reasons for rejection of original research submissions to JAAPA. Methods: Senior JAAPA editors conducted a thematic analysis of reviewer and editor comments and used these broad themes to classify the reasons for rejection of original research manuscripts submitted to JAAPA. Results: From October 2015 through December 2018, 77 research manuscripts were submitted to JAAPA. Fifty-six manuscripts were rejected, resulting in an overall rejection rate of 73.7%. Common reasons for rejection included: methodologic issues (55.4%), content outside the journal's scope (42.9%), poor writing quality (17.9%), guideline nonadherence (3.6%), lack of novelty (3.6%), and author(s) declining to revise the manuscript (1.8%). Conclusion: The most common reasons for manuscript rejection can be overcome through research planning and manuscript preparation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N