Prototyping Criptical Neural Engineering — Tentatively Cripping Neural Engineering's Cultural Practices for Cyborg Survival and Flourishing.

This Discussion Note calls for attention to the cultural practices of Neural Engineering as part of the life sciences as practices and technologies of manufacturing life. Through focusing on Disability, Ableism, and especially Technoableism within the field, I point out instances of onto-epistemolog...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:NanoEthics Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 35 - 50
Main Author: Rasper, Romy
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Apr2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
Description
Summary:This Discussion Note calls for attention to the cultural practices of Neural Engineering as part of the life sciences as practices and technologies of manufacturing life. Through focusing on Disability, Ableism, and especially Technoableism within the field, I point out instances of onto-epistemological violence, which influence the likelihood of survival of disabled people individually and as a (cultural and political) group. By drawing on Crip Technoscience, a method assemblage is introduced that allows to address these issues in an intersectional-kyriarchal understanding of interlocking systems of privilege and oppression through generative critique and productive collaborative work. Criptical Neural Engineering is dedicated to disability justice and disability gain. It centers disabled people as epistemic activists and demands response-ability and accountability from non-disabled people, specifically engineers that want to build adaptive technologies with disabled people.