Apie priekaištą dėl nerelevantiškumo D. Lewiso modaliniam realizmui.

The article deals with the charge of irrelevance levelled against D. Lewis's modal realism, notably known as a reductionist account of modality. The charge of irrelevance is apparently one of the most popular objections to modal realism though it often seems that the debate surrounding this charge i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Problems / Problemos Vol. 101; pp. 52 - 66
Autor principal: Morkūnaitė, Monika
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=156755883&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 156755883
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2022
      vid: 101
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        156755883
        10.15388/Problemos.101.5
      ppf: 52
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.2MB
      tig:
        atl: Apie priekaištą dėl nerelevantiškumo D. Lewiso modaliniam realizmui.
      aug:
        au: Morkūnaitė, Monika
        affil: Vilniaus universiteto, Filosofijos istorijos ir analitinės filosofijos katedra
      su:
        Realism
        Intuition
        Argument
      sug:
        subj:
          Realism
          Intuition
          Argument
      keyword:
        David Lewis
        irrelevance
        modal realism
        reduction of modality
        Davidas Lewisas
        modalinis realizmas
        modalumų redukcija
        nerelevantiškumas
      ab:
        The article deals with the charge of irrelevance levelled against D. Lewis's modal realism, notably known as a reductionist account of modality. The charge of irrelevance is apparently one of the most popular objections to modal realism though it often seems that the debate surrounding this charge is not very fruitful since in this context it is common to appeal, implicitly or explicitly, to different criteria for theory choice. As a result, the article deals with the problem in a slightly different manner. The article addresses arguments aimed to show that, contrary to what is often stated, modal realism does not violate our pre-theoretical intuitions, as well as arguments aimed to respond to the charge of irrelevance without appealing to criteria for theory choice at all but providing different reasons instead. However, the aim of this article is to show that all these arguments are rather unconvincing.
        Straipsnyje nagrinėjamas reduktyvistinei D. Lewiso modalumų teorijai, vadinamai modaliniu realizmu, pateikiamas priekaištas dėl nerelevantiškumo. Tai yra vienas populiariausių prieš modalinį realizmą nukreiptų kontrargumentų, tačiau su šiuo priekaištu susijusios diskusijos neretai pasirodo esančios neproduktyvios tuo požiūriu, jog jose implicitiškai ar eksplicitiškai remiamasi skirtingais teorijų pasirinkimo kriterijais. Todėl, siekiant pakreipti ginčą kiek produktyvesne vaga, čia analizuojami argumentai, kuriais modalinį realizmą nuo minėto priekaišto siekiama apginti arba neigiant įsigalėjusią nuostatą, kad ši teorija pažeidžia mūsų ikiteorines intuicijas, arba apskritai pateikiant kitus, su teorijų pasirinkimo kriterijais nesusijusius motyvus. Visgi straipsnyje bandoma parodyti, kad nei vienas iš šių argumentų neturėtų įtikinti modalinio realizmo kritikų.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Lithuanian
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N