Valerijaus Podorogos mimesis samprata: jusliniai teksto suvokimo aspektai.

The paper aims to analyse and understand tensions and meanings in the notion of mimesis in the perspective of philosophical anthropology. Classical mimesis theories, which stretch from classical antiquity to modern works by E. Auerbach or P. Ricoeur, are often associated with poetics, narratology or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Problems / Problemos Vol. 101; pp. 118 - 132
Autor principal: Juodeika, Rytis
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=156755888&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 156755888
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2022
      vid: 101
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        156755888
        10.15388/Problemos.101.10
      ppf: 118
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.3MB
      tig:
        atl: Valerijaus Podorogos mimesis samprata: jusliniai teksto suvokimo aspektai.
      aug:
        au: Juodeika, Rytis
        affil: Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto, Filosofijos katedra
      su:
        Literary theory
        Narratology
        Classical antiquities
        Mimesis
        Philosophical anthropology
        Poetics
        Anthropology
      sug:
        subj:
          Literary theory
          Narratology
          Classical antiquities
          Mimesis
          Philosophical anthropology
          Poetics
          Anthropology
      keyword:
        analytic anthropology
        anthropograms
        Ricoeur
        analitinė antropologija
        antropogramos
        mimesis
        Podoroga
        Ricoeuras
      ab:
        The paper aims to analyse and understand tensions and meanings in the notion of mimesis in the perspective of philosophical anthropology. Classical mimesis theories, which stretch from classical antiquity to modern works by E. Auerbach or P. Ricoeur, are often associated with poetics, narratology or other literature theory studies. V. Podoroga talks about anthropological and phenomenological mimesis, not only about 'external', Aristotelian version, but also about internal mimesis. He focuses on the experience of the body as the basis of mimesis. The author explains how mimesis in Podoroga's version acquires new meanings and demonstrates how Podoroga's matrixes of anthropograms complement, discuss and transgress hermeneutical models of Ricoeur. The author claims that the method of Podoroga brings us to some kind of a unique 'system', that could be compared to the ideas of 'the death of the author' (R. Barthes) or 'the open work' (U. Eco). Podoroga shows us an alternative, non-semiotic and mimetic approach in contemporary thought, that has not been widely discussed yet in both Russian and English sources.
        Straipsnyje analizuojama, kokios įtampos ir reikšmės slypi mimesis sąvokoje filosofinės antropologijos perspektyvos požiūriu. Klasikinės mimesis teorijos, besidriekiančios nuo antikos iki pat modernių E. Auerbacho ar P. Ricoeuro darbų, dažnai siejamos su poetika, naratologija ar kitais literatūrai skirtais tyrinėjimais. V. Podoroga siūlo kalbėti apie antropologinius bei fenomenologinius mimesis pjūvius, t. y. ne tik apie išorinį, „aristoteliškąjį", tačiau ir apie vidinį mimesis, pažvelgti į kūno patirtis kaip į mimesis pagrindą. Tekste atskleidžiama, kaip Podorogos traktuotėje mimesis įgyja naują prasmę, ir demonstruojama, kaip Podorogos antropogramų matricos papildo, diskutuoja ir peržengia hermeneutinius Ricoeuro modelius. Straipsnyje teigiama, kad Podorogos metodas atveda mus prie tam tikros „sistemos", kurią galima būtų lyginti su Rolando Bartheso „autoriaus mirties" ar Umberto Eco „atviro kūrinio" idėjomis. Podoroga pasiūlo alternatyvią, ne semiotinę, o mimetinę šiuolaikinės filosofijos prieigą, kuri iki šiol nėra išsamiai aptarta nei rusiškuose, nei angliškuose šaltiniuose.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Lithuanian
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N