Organizational complexity in big science: strategies and practices.

Studies on ‘Big Science’ have shifted our perspective from the complexity of scientific objects and their representations to the complexity of sociotechnical arrangements. However, how scientists in large-scale research attend to this complexity to facilitate and afford knowledge production has rare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 200; no. 3; pp. 1 - 26
Autores principales: Merz, Martina, Sorgner, Helene
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jun2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=156757972&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 156757972
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2022
      vid: 200
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        156757972
        10.1007/s11229-022-03649-3
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 25
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 889KB
      tig:
        atl: Organizational complexity in big science: strategies and practices.
      aug:
        au:
          Merz, Martina
          Sorgner, Helene
        affil: University of Klagenfurt, Sterneckstrasse 15, 9020, Klagenfurt, Austria
      sug:
      keyword:
        Big Science
        Bureaucracy
        Large Hadron Collider
        Organizational complexity
        Segmentation
        Standardization
      ab: Studies on ‘Big Science’ have shifted our perspective from the complexity of scientific objects and their representations to the complexity of sociotechnical arrangements. However, how scientists in large-scale research attend to this complexity to facilitate and afford knowledge production has rarely been considered to date. In this article, we locate organizational complexity on the level of organizing practices that follow multiple and divergent logics. We identify three strategies of managing organizational complexity, drawing on existing literature on large-scale research as well as own empirical research. The three strategies are: segmenting research infrastructure, introducing elements of bureaucratic governance, and implementing standards and standardization. We illustrate these strategies with examples from our empirical case study on experimental particle physics research at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider. While the strategies we identified help to cope with the complexity of some organizational tasks by dividing, ordering, or mediating between divergent organizational logics, we find that organizational complexity overall is not reduced but rather displaced. We argue that dealing with complexity is a dynamic and ongoing process, which inevitably generates novel organizational complexity.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2022. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N