Translation of novel antiemetic to sub‐Saharan Africa using diffusion of innovation framework.
Objective: Studies indicate inhaled isopropyl alcohol (IIA) is effective or superior to ondansetron for adult patients. Although quick‐acting and low cost, it cannot be assumed this remedy is suitable for adoption in all settings. We explored how an innovative antiemetic remedy studied in the United...
| Publicado en: | Public Health Nursing Vol. 39; no. 3; pp. 528 - 536 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
May/Jun2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=156784365&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 156784365 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 07371209 2B6 jtl: Public Health Nursing issn: 07371209 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: May/Jun2022 vid: 39 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 156784365 153144477 156784365 156784365 10.1111/phn.12992 156784365 ppf: 528 ppct: 8 formats: tig: atl: Translation of novel antiemetic to sub‐Saharan Africa using diffusion of innovation framework. aug: au: Bostwick, Linda W. Champion, Jane D. affil: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin Texas, , USA sug: subj: Diffusion of Innovation Antiemetics Therapeutic Use Change Management Implementation Science Nausea and Vomiting Drug Therapy Africa South of the Sahara Qualitative Studies Purposive Sample Human Health Personnel Semi-Structured Interview Thematic Analysis Content Analysis Descriptive Research Malaria Aromatherapy Male Female Adult Middle Age Adolescence Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Adolescent: 13-18 years Male Female ab: Objective: Studies indicate inhaled isopropyl alcohol (IIA) is effective or superior to ondansetron for adult patients. Although quick‐acting and low cost, it cannot be assumed this remedy is suitable for adoption in all settings. We explored how an innovative antiemetic remedy studied in the United States translates to a sub‐Saharan Africa clinic/hospital setting using Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation Framework. Design: Qualitative design with purposive sampling. Sample: Health care staff (n = 11) providing and community members (n = 22) accessing health care services in a sub‐Saharan Africa clinic/hospital. Measurements: Semi‐structured interviews with coding and identification of themes via deductive content analysis using Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation Framework. Results: Nausea and vomiting was a common complaint, with malaria the most common etiology. Participants emphasized treatment of etiology over symptomatic treatment and described previous aromatherapy use. IIA advantages included administration route, quick‐acting, self‐administration, portable, available, and easy trialability. Participants expressed concerns regarding use of term "alcohol" as potentially offensive to others. Conclusion: Use of Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation framework identified barriers and facilitators to translation of a novel antiemetic remedy for sub‐Saharan Africa clinic/hospital settings. Evaluating clinical innovations from perspectives of relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability enhances adoption of innovations within clinical settings. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|