COVID-19 Lockdown Policies: An Interdisciplinary Review.

Lockdown interventions employed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have been evaluated via research at biomedical, economic, psychological, and ethical levels of analysis. The aim of this article is to evaluate arguments from these four perspectives simultaneously within an interdisciplinary biops...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Integral Review: A Transdisciplinary & Transcultural Journal for New Thought, Research, & Praxis Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 5 - 37
Autor principal: Robinson, Oliver C.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: ARINA, Inc. Dec2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=156827937&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 156827937
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15533069
        781Z
      jtl: Integral Review: A Transdisciplinary & Transcultural Journal for New Thought, Research, & Praxis
      issn: 15533069
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2021
      vid: 17
      iid: 1
      pid: 47364
      pub: ARINA, Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui: 156827937
      ppf: 5
      ppct: 32
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.8MB
      tig:
        atl: COVID-19 Lockdown Policies: An Interdisciplinary Review.
      aug:
        au: Robinson, Oliver C.
        affil: Associate Professor of Psychology in the School of Human Sciences at the University of Greenwich, London
      su:
        Stay-at-home orders
        COVID-19
        COVID-19 pandemic
        Medical research
        Population health
      sug:
        subj:
          Stay-at-home orders
          COVID-19
          COVID-19 pandemic
          Medical research
          Population health
      keyword:
        ethics
        government interventions
        health policy
        health psychology
        interdisciplinary
        lockdown
      ab: Lockdown interventions employed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have been evaluated via research at biomedical, economic, psychological, and ethical levels of analysis. The aim of this article is to evaluate arguments from these four perspectives simultaneously within an interdisciplinary biopsychosocial review to help inform the political and scientific debate surrounding them. Biomedical evidence from the early months of the pandemic suggests that lockdowns were associated with a reduced viral reproductive rate, but that less restrictive measures also had a similar effect. Lockdowns are associated with reduced COVID-19 mortality in epidemiological modelling studies but not in studies based on empirical data from the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological research supports the proposition that lockdowns may exacerbate stressors such as social isolation and unemployment that have been shown to be strong predictors of falling ill if exposed to a respiratory virus. Studies at the economic level of analysis points to the possibility that deaths associated with economic harms or underfunding of other health issues may outweigh the deaths that lockdowns save, and that the extremely high financial cost of lockdowns may have negative implications for overall population health in terms of diminished resources for treating other conditions. Research on ethics in relation to lockdowns points to the inevitability of value judgements in balancing different kinds of harms and benefits than lockdowns cause. Suggestions for future research are provided to promote an increasingly fine-grained and nuanced evaluation of these policies.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Integral Review: A Transdisciplinary & Transcultural Journal for New Thought, Research, & Praxis is the property of ARINA, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Integral Review: A Transdisciplinary & Transcultural Journal for New Thought, Research, & Praxis
      holder: ARINA, Inc.
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N