A typology of Goal-Source marking in transfer events.

This paper discusses the coding of Goals and Sources from a cross-linguistic perspective and proposes a formal-functional typology based on how animacy and direction affect their coding. The proposed typology comprises three types; Goal vs. Source-languages, animacy and direction-languages, and vari...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Studies in Language Vol. 46; no. 2; pp. 352 - 376
Main Author: Kittilä, Seppo
Format: Article
Published: John Benjamins Publishing Co. 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=157228740&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 157228740
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03784177
        O2Z
      jtl: Studies in Language
      issn: 03784177
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2022
      vid: 46
      iid: 2
      pid: 11093
      pub: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        157228740
        10.1075/sl.20020.kit
      ppf: 352
      ppct: 24
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: A typology of Goal-Source marking in transfer events.
      aug:
        au: Kittilä, Seppo
        affil: University of Helsinki, 040af2s02
      su:
        Goal (Psychology)
        Source code
      sug:
        subj:
          Goal (Psychology)
          Source code
      keyword:
        animacy
        argument marking
        goal
        source
        typology
      ab: This paper discusses the coding of Goals and Sources from a cross-linguistic perspective and proposes a formal-functional typology based on how animacy and direction affect their coding. The proposed typology comprises three types; Goal vs. Source-languages, animacy and direction-languages, and variable types. The paper shows that the coding of Goals and Sources is primarily conditioned by their semantic roles (by the direction of transfer/motion), but animacy makes an important contribution in some languages as well. Moreover, the paper will also show that animacy affects the coding of Goals more drastically than it affects the coding of Sources. Goals and Sources differ from each other also in that Goals are more often coded by cases, while Sources are usually more peripheral participants and they are thus often marked by adpositions. One of the proposed reasons for this is found in the goal-oriented nature of humans.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N