Bovine versus porcine acellular dermal matrix for abdominal wall herniorrhaphy or bridging.

Background: The management of complicated ventral hernias (CVH), namely ventral hernias in actively or recently infected/contaminated operative fields, and open abdomens in which the native fascia cannot be primarily reapproximated, pose a surgical challenge. Fetal Bovine and Porcine Acellular Derma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery Vol. 48; no. 3; pp. 1993 - 2002
Autores principales: Van Orden, Kathryn, Santos, Jeffrey, Stanfield, Brent, Frost, Landon S., Ruditsky, Alexander, Foster, Andrea, Brahmbhatt, Tejal S., Burke, Peter A., Fernandez-Moure, Joseph, Haines, Krista, Agarwal, Suresh, Kasotakis, George
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Jun2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=157411438&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 157411438
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        18639933
        3C05
      jtl: European Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery
      issn: 18639933
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2022
      vid: 48
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        157411438
        149235130
        157411438
        157411438
        10.1007/s00068-021-01641-z
        157411438
      ppf: 1993
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Bovine versus porcine acellular dermal matrix for abdominal wall herniorrhaphy or bridging.
      aug:
        au:
          Van Orden, Kathryn
          Santos, Jeffrey
          Stanfield, Brent
          Frost, Landon S.
          Ruditsky, Alexander
          Foster, Andrea
          Brahmbhatt, Tejal S.
          Burke, Peter A.
          Fernandez-Moure, Joseph
          Haines, Krista
          Agarwal, Suresh
          Kasotakis, George
        affil: Division of Trauma, Acute Care Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 02118, Boston, MA, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Dermis Surgery
          Hernia Surgery
          Herniorrhaphy Methods
          Biocompatible Materials Therapeutic Use
          Surgical Mesh
          Tertiary Health Care
          Urban Areas
          Academic Medical Centers
          Human
          Treatment Outcomes
          Postoperative Period
          Comparative Studies
          Retrospective Design
          Record Review
          Interviews
          Cox Proportional Hazards Model
          Regression
          Recurrence Risk Factors
          Risk Assessment
          Descriptive Statistics
          Immunosuppression
      ab: Background: The management of complicated ventral hernias (CVH), namely ventral hernias in actively or recently infected/contaminated operative fields, and open abdomens in which the native fascia cannot be primarily reapproximated, pose a surgical challenge. Fetal Bovine and Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix (BADM and PADM) biologic meshes are being increasingly used in these scenarios. A comparison, however, of clinically relevant outcomes between the two is lacking. With this investigation, we aim to review and compare clinically relevant outcomes in patients that underwent abdominal wall herniorrhaphy with either BADM or PADM at a tertiary urban academic institution over a 5-year period. Methods: Patients who had a BADM or PADM implanted during CVH over a 5-year period at a tertiary urban academic hospital were identified. Baseline clinical and hernia characteristics, as well as postoperative outcomes were compared after a retrospective chart review. Phone interviews were also conducted to assess for recurrence, followed by in-person visits as indicated. Cox Proportional Hazard regression was fitted to identify risk factors for recurrence. Results: Of the 140 patients who underwent biologic mesh implantation for CVH, 109 were for ventral hernia repair and 31 for open abdomen bridging. Mean age was 52.7 ± 14.2 and males constituted 57.9% of our sample, while 25.1% had undergone > 5 prior abdominal operations. Thirty percent were active smokers, and another 30% required emergency surgery. Only immunosuppression was a risk factor for recurrence [HR 13.3 (1.04–169.2), p = 0.047] on Cox Proportional Hazard regression, while mesh selection had no effect. Conclusions: Both BADM and PADM meshes perform well in CVH, with satisfactory recurrence rates, only slightly higher compared to traditional synthetic mesh repairs.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N