In Defense of Tigers and Wolves.

McMahan, Nussbaum, and Johannsen have recently suggested that humans should seek to eliminate predators from the wild or avoid reintroducing them if this can be done without great harm to an ecosystem. This is because predators cause a great deal of pain to those sentient animals which are their pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Ethics & the Environment Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 17 - 39
Autor principal: Vincelette, Alan
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Indiana University Press Spring2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=157466787&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 157466787
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10856633
        FL8
      jtl: Ethics & the Environment
      issn: 10856633
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring2022
      vid: 27
      iid: 1
      pid: 211
      pub: Indiana University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        157466787
        10.2979/ethicsenviro.27.1.02
      ppf: 17
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 313KB
      tig:
        atl: In Defense of Tigers and Wolves.
      aug:
        au: Vincelette, Alan
      su:
        Habit
        Suffering
        Predatory animals
        Tigers
        Ecosystems
        Wolves
      sug:
        subj:
          Habit
          Suffering
          Predatory animals
          Tigers
          Ecosystems
          Wolves
      ab: McMahan, Nussbaum, and Johannsen have recently suggested that humans should seek to eliminate predators from the wild or avoid reintroducing them if this can be done without great harm to an ecosystem. This is because predators cause a great deal of pain to those sentient animals which are their prey. This paper will first challenge the pragmatic aspects of such a position on the global level, arguing that it would be extremely difficult if not impossible to remove predators from the environment without doing great ecological harm. Because removal of predators might be considered more feasible on the micro scale this paper will go on to challenge the axiological foundations of such a view. In particular defenders of the removal of predators from the environment tend to base their position on the preferencing of the disvalue of pain over the value of life. Yet if life itself has value it can be a good even with those beings that cause pain to others. Moreover, there is a value to diverse forms of life that must also be acknowledged. An ecosystem with diverse habits and life forms exercising different ways of being has great value even if again this comes at the cost of suffering and pain to some of the creatures in it. Once these things are understood it is clear that predators should not be eliminated from the wild and indeed should be reintroduced into ecosystems where they once flourished.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N