The Evolution Of Elucidation: The Snowden Cases Before The Investigatory Powers Tribunal.
In 2018 the European Court of Human Rights found that the UK's Investigatory Powers Tribunal is an 'effective remedy' when it comes to reviewing the compatibility of the UK's domestic legal framework governing the interception of communication and other communications surveillance powers with the re...
| Publicado en: | Modern Law Review Vol. 85; no. 4; pp. 906 - 938 |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jul2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=157517509&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 157517509 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00267961 D8H jtl: Modern Law Review issn: 00267961 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jul2022 vid: 85 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 157517509 10.1111/1468-2230.12713 ppf: 906 ppct: 32 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 263KB tig: atl: The Evolution Of Elucidation: The Snowden Cases Before The Investigatory Powers Tribunal. aug: su: European Court of Human Rights Snowden, Edward, 1983- Secrecy Security management United Kingdom sug: subj: United Kingdom European Court of Human Rights Snowden, Edward, 1983- Secrecy Security management keyword: ConstitutionalK& administrative law (public law) Human Rights and civil liberties Law and social theory ab: In 2018 the European Court of Human Rights found that the UK's Investigatory Powers Tribunal is an 'effective remedy' when it comes to reviewing the compatibility of the UK's domestic legal framework governing the interception of communication and other communications surveillance powers with the requirements of the European Convention on Human Rights. In particular, the Court praised the Tribunal's 'elucidatory function', which it performed during a series of cases that arose in the aftermath of Edward Snowden's disclosures in 2013. This article analyses and historicises the elucidatory function by comparing it with previous cases where the High Court and the IPT resolved questions of law arising from similar problems. Using insights derived from systems theory, the article argues that the elucidatory function evolved as a containment measure in response to unexpected crises of control over classified information. The procedure resolves conflicts between secrecy, security, and the publicity required by the law itself. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Modern Law Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Modern Law Review holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2022 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|