Choice Implies Meaning: The "Imperatival Participles" of 1 Peter.

That 1 Peter uses participles where imperatives are expected is clear. Why it does so is not. Scholarly discussion has focused on whether the participles are independent or dependent. Early grammarians argued that these participles were dependent but struggled to explain why the participles appeared...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Novum Testamentum Vol. 64; no. 3; pp. 318 - 342
Main Author: Miller, Timothy E.
Format: Article
Published: Brill Academic Publishers 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=157540969&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 157540969
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00481009
        C4I
      jtl: Novum Testamentum
      issn: 00481009
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2022
      vid: 64
      iid: 3
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        157540969
        10.1163/15685365-bja10010
      ppf: 318
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 411KB
      tig:
        atl: Choice Implies Meaning: The "Imperatival Participles" of 1 Peter.
      aug:
        au: Miller, Timothy E.
        affil: Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary, Allen Park, Michigan, USA
      su:
        Grammarians
        Jesus Christ
        Verbs
        Discourse analysis
        Bible
      sug:
        subj:
          Grammarians
          Jesus Christ
          Verbs
          Discourse analysis
          Bible
      keyword:
        1 Peter
        discourse
        Greek
        imperatives
        participles
      ab: That 1 Peter uses participles where imperatives are expected is clear. Why it does so is not. Scholarly discussion has focused on whether the participles are independent or dependent. Early grammarians argued that these participles were dependent but struggled to explain why the participles appeared far from their head verb. Modern grammarians have argued that they are independent, yet they have given insufficient attention to why the participle is used instead of the imperative. This article suggests a path forward, which vindicates the earlier interpretation by providing a discourse explanation for the "imperatival participles." Stated simply, the participle is operating according to its normal function by structuring the discourse. That the participles in 1 Peter are far from their head verb shows the complex structuring of the letter, with the main imperatives moving the discourse along and the participles expressing ways that those head verbs may be accomplished.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Novum Testamentum is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Novum Testamentum
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N