Modernization Planner, Authoritarian Paternalist, and Rising Power: Evolving Government Positions in China's Internet Securitization.
This article combines semantic network and critical discourse analysis to examine China's official cybersecurity discourse from 1983 to 2018. By integrating the securitization theory and positioning theory, it shifts the analytical focus from 'threat politics' to 'power politics' by theorizing secur...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Contemporary China Vol. 31; no. 136; pp. 574 - 592 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jul2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=157588800&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 157588800 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10670564 LCC jtl: Journal of Contemporary China issn: 10670564 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jul2022 vid: 31 iid: 136 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 157588800 10.1080/10670564.2021.1985832 ppf: 574 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T db: hlh ui: 157588800 – @attributes: type: P db: hlh ui: 157588800 tig: atl: Modernization Planner, Authoritarian Paternalist, and Rising Power: Evolving Government Positions in China's Internet Securitization. aug: au: Miao, Weishan Han, Rongbin affil: Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, China University of Georgia, USA su: Authoritarianism Pressure groups Internet security Threats Asset backed financing sug: subj: Authoritarianism Pressure groups Secondary Market Financing Securitization vehicles Wired Telecommunications Carriers Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals Environment, Conservation and Wildlife Organizations Other Social Advocacy Organizations Social advocacy organizations Human Rights Organizations Internet security Threats Asset backed financing ab: This article combines semantic network and critical discourse analysis to examine China's official cybersecurity discourse from 1983 to 2018. By integrating the securitization theory and positioning theory, it shifts the analytical focus from 'threat politics' to 'power politics' by theorizing securitization as a dynamic power game. Three historical phases of cybersecurity discourse are identified, reflecting China's evolved understanding of the issue and how it defines rights, obligations and power relations among involved actors. Though the state's self-positioning evolved across time, first as a modernization planner, then an authoritarian paternalist, and ultimately a rising power; all three stages demonstrate continuity in featuring a state-society power relationship with the state in the presiding position to securitize the Internet instrumentally toward pursuing its policy and strategic goals. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|