What shapes research and research capacity building in rural health services? Context matters.
Objective: To determine the contextual factors influencing research and research capacity building in rural health settings. Design: Qualitative study using semi‐structured telephone interviews to collect data regarding health professionals' research education and capacity building. Analysis involve...
| Publicado en: | Australian Journal of Rural Health Vol. 30; no. 3; pp. 410 - 422 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jun2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=157665497&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 157665497 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10385282 FQO jtl: Australian Journal of Rural Health issn: 10385282 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jun2022 vid: 30 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 157665497 155355472 157665497 157665497 10.1111/ajr.12852 157665497 ppf: 410 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: What shapes research and research capacity building in rural health services? Context matters. aug: au: Wong Shee, Anna Quilliam, Claire Corboy, Denise Glenister, Kristen McKinstry, Carol Beauchamp, Alison Alston, Laura Maybery, Darryl Aras, Drew Mc Namara, Kevin affil: Ballarat Health Services, Ballarat Victoria,, Australia sug: subj: Health Services Research Victoria Team Building Rural Health Services Human Funding Source Victoria Qualitative Studies Purposive Sample Semi-Structured Interview Telephone Audiorecording Thematic Analysis Teamwork Research Subjects Self-Efficacy Confidence ab: Objective: To determine the contextual factors influencing research and research capacity building in rural health settings. Design: Qualitative study using semi‐structured telephone interviews to collect data regarding health professionals' research education and capacity building. Analysis involved inductive coding using Braun and Clark's thematic analysis; and deductive mapping to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Setting: Victorian rural health services and university campuses. Participants: Twenty senior rural health managers, academics and/or research coordinators. Participants had at least three years' experience in rural public health, health‐related research or health education settings. Main outcome measures: Contextual factors influencing the operationalisation and prioritisation of research capacity building in rural health services. Results: Findings reflected the CFIR domains and constructs: intervention characteristics (relative advantage); outer setting (cosmopolitanism, external policies and incentives); inner setting (implementation climate, readiness for implementation); characteristics of individuals (self‐efficacy); and process (planning, engaging). Findings illustrated the implementation context and the complex contextual tensions, which either prevent or enhance research capacity building in rural health services. Conclusions: Realising the Australian Government's vision for improved health service provision and health outcomes in rural areas requires a strong culture of research and research capacity building in rural health services. Low levels of rural research funding, chronic workforce shortages and the tension between undertaking research and delivering health care, all significantly impact the operationalisation and prioritisation of research capacity building in rural health services. Effective policy and investment addressing these contextual factors is crucial for the success of research capacity building in rural health services. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|