SIBAT--A Computerized Assessment Tool for Suicide Ideation and Behavior: Development and Psychometric Properties.

Objective: Most assessments of suicidal ideation and behavior (SIB) are limited by reliance on a single assessor, typically a clinician or patient, with scant detail on patient-related drivers of SIB and inability to detect rapid change in SIB. Furthermore, many techniques do not include a semistruc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience Vol. 19; no. 4-6; pp. 36 - 48
Autores principales: ALPHS, LARRY, FU, DONG, WILLIAMSON, DAVID, JAMIESON, CAROL, GREIST, JOHN, HARRINGTON, MAGDALENA, LINDENMAYER, JEANPIERRE, SMITH, CHERYL MCCULLUM, SHEEHAN, DAVID V., SHELTON, RICHARD C., WICKS, PAUL, CANUSO, CARLA M.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Matrix Medical Communications, LLC Apr-Jun2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=157828215&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 157828215
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        21588333
        DAD5
      jtl: Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience
      issn: 21588333
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr-Jun2022
      vid: 19
      iid: 4-6
      pid: 33670
      pub: Matrix Medical Communications, LLC
      place: West Chester, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        157828215
        157828215
        157828215
        157828215
      ppf: 36
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: SIBAT--A Computerized Assessment Tool for Suicide Ideation and Behavior: Development and Psychometric Properties.
      aug:
        au:
          ALPHS, LARRY
          FU, DONG
          WILLIAMSON, DAVID
          JAMIESON, CAROL
          GREIST, JOHN
          HARRINGTON, MAGDALENA
          LINDENMAYER, JEANPIERRE
          SMITH, CHERYL MCCULLUM
          SHEEHAN, DAVID V.
          SHELTON, RICHARD C.
          WICKS, PAUL
          CANUSO, CARLA M.
        affil: Denovo Biopharma in San Diego, California
      sug:
        subj:
          Suicidal Ideation
          Behavior Evaluation
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Instrument Construction
          Psychometrics Evaluation
          Human
          Collaboration
          Content Validity
          Validation Studies
          Algorithms
          Computer-Aided Design
          Patient-Reported Outcomes
          Semi-Structured Interview
          Suicide Risk Factors
          Risk Assessment
          Interrater Reliability
          Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
          Intrarater Reliability
          Concurrent Validity
      ab: Objective: Most assessments of suicidal ideation and behavior (SIB) are limited by reliance on a single assessor, typically a clinician or patient, with scant detail on patient-related drivers of SIB and inability to detect rapid change in SIB. Furthermore, many techniques do not include a semistructured interview, increasing rater variability. The Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT) addresses these limitations. Design: More than 30 experts in scale development, statistics, and clinical management of suicidal patients collaborated over a greater than four-year period to develop the SIBAT. Input for content and validity was received from patients, clinicians, and regulatory authorities in the United States (US) and Europe. Psychometric properties of the SIBAT were evaluated in validation studies. Results: The SIBAT is organized into eight independent patient- or clinician-rated modules with branching logic and scoring algorithms, which necessitates computerization. Patient-reported information is first captured in Modules 1 to 5. Thereafter, an experienced clinician reviews the patient's report, conducts a semistructured interview (Module 6), and assesses the patient's suicide risk (Module 7) and optimal antisuicide management (Module 8). Input from cognitive interviews of diverse adult, adolescent, and clinician participants was incorporated into the final version of the SIBAT. Psychometric testing demonstrated good inter-rater reliability (intraclass coefficient range: 0.68-0.82), intra-rater reliability (weighted-kappa range: 0.64-0.76), and concurrent validity with other instruments for assessing SIB. Conclusion: Patient- and clinician-based assessments and the psychometric studies summarized in this report support the validity and reliability of the SIBAT for capturing critical information related to assessment of SIB in adolescents and adults at risk for suicide.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N