Non-Canonical Subjects in the Prakrit of Kōūhala's Līlāvaī.

Kōūhala's Līlāvaī, a romance in Prakrit verse from around 800 ce, has two types of constructions that present "syntactical difficulties" (according to the text's first editor): the use of mhi (I am) in the meaning of maē (by me), and the use of amhēhi (by us) and tumhēhi (by you) in the meanings of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of the American Oriental Society Vol. 142; no. 2; pp. 273 - 293
Autor principal: OLLETT, ANDREW
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA) Apr-Jun2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=157850201&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 157850201
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00030279
        JOY
      jtl: Journal of the American Oriental Society
      issn: 00030279
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr-Jun2022
      vid: 142
      iid: 2
      pid: 1463
      pub: American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA)
    artinfo:
      ui:
        157850201
        10.7817/jaos.142.2.2022.ar013
      ppf: 273
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 6.4MB
      tig:
        atl: Non-Canonical Subjects in the Prakrit of Kōūhala's Līlāvaī.
      aug:
        au: OLLETT, ANDREW
        affil: UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
      su:
        Apocryphal Gospels
        Prakrit languages
        Indo-Aryan languages
        Canonical transformations
        Sogdians
      sug:
        subj:
          Apocryphal Gospels
          Prakrit languages
          Indo-Aryan languages
          Canonical transformations
          Sogdians
      ab: Kōūhala's Līlāvaī, a romance in Prakrit verse from around 800 ce, has two types of constructions that present "syntactical difficulties" (according to the text's first editor): the use of mhi (I am) in the meaning of maē (by me), and the use of amhēhi (by us) and tumhēhi (by you) in the meanings of amhē (we) and tumhē (you). This article reviews the phenomena and puts them into the context of expressions of agency in related Indic languages, arguing that Prakrit's split ergativity is implicated in both cases. A further conclusion is that the particle hi is all but absent from Kōūhala's Prakrit.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of the American Oriental Society is the property of American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of the American Oriental Society
      holder: American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA)
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N